ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <bogus@does.not.exist.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: No subject
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:01:43 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.8.1242985371.4807.ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org> (raw)

rev. 2.1 now), a single function device may _only_ provide an interrupt
request on pin A and no others.  Pins B-D only have meaning for multi-
function devices.

> > There seems to be some kind of race.  If I have both the AR5416 and 
> > HPT371N, loaded, and after the board has booted(everything is 
> > configured), the "IRQ X  Nobody cared" never occurs.   If i remove 
> > AR5416 mini-pci,  I also never get the "IRQ X  Nobody cared".
> 
> You would have to investigate a) which chip generates the bogus IRQ,
> and b) how to clear it. Then you can clear the IRQ in the platform code,
> or using a PCI quirk code if it's not related to the platform.

It sounds to me like the driver is prodding the chip, and it's generating
an interrupt but the driver hasn't yet registered its handler.  If so,
that's really a driver bug needing to be fixed.

Normally you get a backtrace when a "nobody cared" message is issued -
this should tell you which driver is probably the cause.

             reply	other threads:[~2009-02-27 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-27 19:01 bogus [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-11-19 18:31 No subject bogus
2016-11-19 18:31 bogus
2016-11-19 18:31 bogus
2016-11-19 18:31 bogus
2016-06-13  6:24 bogus
2016-06-13  6:24 bogus
2016-02-09  7:29 bogus
2015-11-16 16:13 bogus
2015-10-12 17:26 bogus
2014-09-13 19:40 bogus
2014-09-13 19:40 bogus
2014-09-13 19:40 bogus
2014-09-13 19:40 bogus
2014-09-13 19:40 bogus
2013-09-15  9:49 bogus
2013-09-15  9:49 bogus
2013-09-15  9:49 bogus
2013-04-03 10:31 bogus
2013-04-03 10:31 bogus
2013-04-03 10:31 bogus
2013-04-03 10:31 bogus
2013-01-16 21:46 bogus
2013-01-16 21:46 bogus
2012-11-08  9:33 bogus
2012-05-25 15:26 bogus
2012-05-25 15:26 bogus
2012-04-05  7:54 bogus
2012-04-05  7:54 bogus
2012-02-27  5:00 bogus
2012-02-27  5:00 bogus
2012-02-27  5:00 bogus
2012-01-15  8:24 bogus
2011-11-12 14:39 bogus
2011-11-12 14:39 bogus
2011-08-05  3:08 bogus
2011-08-05  3:08 bogus
2011-08-05  3:08 bogus
2011-08-05  3:08 bogus
2011-08-05  3:08 bogus
2011-06-04 23:16 bogus
2011-06-04 23:16 bogus
2011-04-07  5:55 bogus
2011-04-07  5:55 bogus
2011-04-07  5:55 bogus
2011-04-07  5:55 bogus
2011-04-07  5:55 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-12-19 23:59 bogus
2010-09-24 14:53 bogus
2010-09-24 14:53 bogus
2010-09-24 14:53 bogus
2010-09-24 14:53 bogus
2010-09-24 14:53 bogus
2010-09-24 14:53 bogus
2010-09-24 14:53 bogus
2010-09-24 14:53 bogus
2010-09-24 14:53 bogus
2010-09-24 14:53 bogus
2010-09-24 14:53 bogus
2010-07-23 10:05 bogus
2010-03-25 17:02 bogus
2010-03-25 17:02 bogus
2009-02-27 19:01 bogus
2009-02-27 19:01 bogus
2009-02-27 19:01 bogus
2009-02-27 19:01 bogus
2009-02-27 19:01 bogus
2009-02-27 19:01 bogus
2009-02-15  8:49 bogus
2009-01-04 17:33 bogus
2009-01-04 17:33 bogus
2008-10-14 11:50 bogus
2008-10-14 11:50 bogus
2008-10-14 11:50 bogus
2008-10-14 11:50 bogus
2008-10-14 11:50 bogus
2008-10-14 11:50 bogus
2008-10-14 11:50 bogus
2008-10-14 11:50 bogus
2008-10-14 11:50 bogus
2008-10-14 11:50 bogus
2008-10-14 11:50 bogus
2008-07-28  4:41 bogus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mailman.8.1242985371.4807.ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    --to=bogus@does.not.exist.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).