From: Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@redhat.com>
To: wangchi@kylinos.cn
Cc: paul@paul-moore.com, eparis@redhat.com, audit@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: Fix data race in audit_log_start()
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 10:40:05 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260618134004.3398831-2-rrobaina@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617130038.57465-1-wangchi@kylinos.cn>
Hi Chi,
Good catch, the patch looks good to me.
However, I found three additional instances of the same pattern that
should be included in this patch for completeness:
1. Line 953 in kauditd_thread():
wait_event_freezable(kauditd_wait,
(skb_queue_len(&audit_queue) ? 1 : 0));
2. Line 1286 in audit_receive_msg() (AUDIT_GET handler):
s.backlog = skb_queue_len(&audit_queue);
3. Line 1630 in audit_receive():
if (audit_backlog_limit &&
(skb_queue_len(&audit_queue) > audit_backlog_limit)) {
All three read audit_queue.qlen without synchronization while the queue
is concurrently modified.
diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index dcc657d35776..c074c3717946 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ static int kauditd_thread(void *dummy)
* do the multicast send and rotate records from the
* main queue to the retry/hold queues */
wait_event_freezable(kauditd_wait,
- (skb_queue_len(&audit_queue) ? 1 : 0));
+ (skb_queue_len_lockless(&audit_queue) ? 1 : 0));
}
return 0;
@@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
s.rate_limit = audit_rate_limit;
s.backlog_limit = audit_backlog_limit;
s.lost = atomic_read(&audit_lost);
- s.backlog = skb_queue_len(&audit_queue);
+ s.backlog = skb_queue_len_lockless(&audit_queue);
s.feature_bitmap = AUDIT_FEATURE_BITMAP_ALL;
s.backlog_wait_time = audit_backlog_wait_time;
s.backlog_wait_time_actual = atomic_read(&audit_backlog_wait_time_actual);
@@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ static void audit_receive(struct sk_buff *skb)
/* can't block with the ctrl lock, so penalize the sender now */
if (audit_backlog_limit &&
- (skb_queue_len(&audit_queue) > audit_backlog_limit)) {
+ (skb_queue_len_lockless(&audit_queue) > audit_backlog_limit)) {
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
/* wake kauditd to try and flush the queue */
Reviewed-by: Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@redhat.com>
I hope it helps!
-Ricardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-18 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 13:00 [PATCH] audit: Fix data race in audit_log_start() Chi Wang
2026-06-18 13:40 ` Ricardo Robaina [this message]
2026-06-19 7:42 ` [PATCH v2] audit: Fix data races of skb_queue_len() readers on audit_queue Chi Wang
2026-06-30 20:15 ` Paul Moore
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-17 12:15 [PATCH] audit: Fix data race in audit_log_start() Chi Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260618134004.3398831-2-rrobaina@redhat.com \
--to=rrobaina@redhat.com \
--cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=wangchi@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox