From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@redhat.com>,
audit@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org
Cc: eparis@redhat.com, pablo@netfilter.org, kadlec@netfilter.org,
fw@strlen.de, ej@inai.de, Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] audit: include source and destination ports to NETFILTER_PKT
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 16:41:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7a8d5f64e19f529a7595f26e150826f@paul-moore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250925134156.1948142-1-rrobaina@redhat.com>
On Sep 25, 2025 Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> NETFILTER_PKT records show both source and destination
> addresses, in addition to the associated networking protocol.
> However, it lacks the ports information, which is often
> valuable for troubleshooting.
>
> This patch adds both source and destination port numbers,
> 'sport' and 'dport' respectively, to TCP, UDP, UDP-Lite and
> SCTP-related NETFILTER_PKT records.
>
> type=NETFILTER_PKT ... saddr=127.0.0.1 daddr=127.0.0.1 proto=icmp
> type=NETFILTER_PKT ... saddr=::1 daddr=::1 proto=ipv6-icmp
> type=NETFILTER_PKT ... daddr=127.0.0.1 proto=udp sport=38173 dport=42424
> type=NETFILTER_PKT ... daddr=::1 proto=udp sport=56852 dport=42424
> type=NETFILTER_PKT ... daddr=127.0.0.1 proto=tcp sport=57022 dport=42424
> type=NETFILTER_PKT ... daddr=::1 proto=tcp sport=50810 dport=42424
> type=NETFILTER_PKT ... daddr=127.0.0.1 proto=sctp sport=54944 dport=42424
> type=NETFILTER_PKT ... daddr=::1 proto=sctp sport=57963 dport=42424
>
> Link: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/162
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c b/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c
> index b6a015aee0ce..9fc8a5429fa9 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/netfilter_bridge/ebtables.h>
> #include <net/ipv6.h>
> #include <net/ip.h>
> +#include <linux/sctp.h>
>
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Thomas Graf <tgraf@redhat.com>");
> @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ static bool audit_ip4(struct audit_buffer *ab, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct iphdr _iph;
> const struct iphdr *ih;
> + __be16 dport, sport;
>
> ih = skb_header_pointer(skb, skb_network_offset(skb), sizeof(_iph), &_iph);
> if (!ih)
> @@ -40,6 +42,25 @@ static bool audit_ip4(struct audit_buffer *ab, struct sk_buff *skb)
> audit_log_format(ab, " saddr=%pI4 daddr=%pI4 proto=%hhu",
> &ih->saddr, &ih->daddr, ih->protocol);
>
> + switch (ih->protocol) {
> + case IPPROTO_TCP:
> + sport = tcp_hdr(skb)->source;
> + dport = tcp_hdr(skb)->dest;
> + break;
> + case IPPROTO_UDP:
> + case IPPROTO_UDPLITE:
> + sport = udp_hdr(skb)->source;
> + dport = udp_hdr(skb)->dest;
> + break;
> + case IPPROTO_SCTP:
> + sport = sctp_hdr(skb)->source;
> + dport = sctp_hdr(skb)->dest;
> + }
> +
> + if (ih->protocol == IPPROTO_TCP || ih->protocol == IPPROTO_UDP ||
> + ih->protocol == IPPROTO_UDPLITE || ih->protocol == IPPROTO_SCTP)
> + audit_log_format(ab, " sport=%hu dport=%hu", ntohs(sport), ntohs(dport));
> return true;
> }
Instead of having the switch statement and then doing an additional if
statement, why not fold it all into the switch statement? Yes, you
would have multiple audit_log_format() calls, but they are trivial to
cut-n-paste, and it saves the extra per-packet checking at runtime.
switch (ih->protocol) {
case IPPROTO_TCP:
audit_log_format(ab, " sport=...",
tcp_hdr(skb)->source,
tcp_hdr(skb)->dest);
break;
...
}
... considering how expensive multiple audit_log_format() calls can be,
it might even be worth considering consolidating the two calls into one:
switch (ih->protocol) {
case IPPROTO_TCP:
audit_log_format(ab, " saddr=...",
ih->saddr,
...
tcp_hdr(skb)->source,
tcp_hdr(skb)->dest);
break;
...
default:
audit_log_format(ab, " saddr=...",
ih->saddr,
...);
}
--
paul-moore.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 13:41 [PATCH v2] audit: include source and destination ports to NETFILTER_PKT Ricardo Robaina
2025-09-25 20:41 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2025-09-26 18:28 ` Ricardo Robaina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7a8d5f64e19f529a7595f26e150826f@paul-moore.com \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=ej@inai.de \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=rrobaina@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox