From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jan Koester" <jan.koester@tuxist.de>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, audit@vger.kernel.org,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, "Chuck Lever" <cel@kernel.org>,
"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
"Anna Schumaker" <anna@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/41] uidgid: let kuid_t and kgid_t hold a UUID or a GUID
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 03:17:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-180910@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <740f7687fd823a127ff6c312240eadbd8b3ec209.1792552161.git.jan.koester@tuxist.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 7 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] fs: VFSUIDT_INIT_RAW() initializes .type instead of .legacy
- [High] quota: qid_has_mapping() returns false for UUID/GUIDs in init_user_ns
- [High] uidgid: 20-byte kuid_t and kgid_t cause torn reads and writes on inode ids
- [High] uidgid: __kid_cmp() ordering breaks fib_rule_match() for UUID/GUID sockets
- [High] audit: broken audit_field union aliasing in audit_krule_to_data()
- [Medium] uidgid: __kid_hash() mismatches __kid_cmp() when !CONFIG_MULTIUSER
- [Low] uidgid: 20-byte kuid_t and kgid_t break READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() in tun.c
--
commit 36d10e56f75840b8f3657151d3427526a39d77ae
Author: Jan Koester <jan.koester@tuxist.de>
uidgid: let kuid_t and kgid_t hold a UUID or a GUID
This commit turns kuid_t, kgid_t, vfsuid_t, and vfsgid_t into 20-byte tagged
unions capable of holding a classic 32-bit ID, an RFC 9562 UUID, or a
Microsoft GUID. It also updates ID comparison, hashing, user namespace
mapping, and mount idmapping helpers to handle non-legacy IDs.
> diff --git a/fs/mnt_idmapping.c b/fs/mnt_idmapping.c
> index cb61fbdb52e90..c36e74a37138c 100644
> --- a/fs/mnt_idmapping.c
> +++ b/fs/mnt_idmapping.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ vfsuid_t make_vfsuid(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> return VFSUIDT_INIT(kuid);
> if (idmap == &invalid_mnt_idmap)
> return INVALID_VFSUID;
> + /* idmappings map classic ids only; UUIDs and GUIDs pass unchanged */
> + if (!uid_is_legacy(kuid))
> + return kuid_has_mapping(fs_userns, kuid) ?
> + VFSUIDT_INIT(kuid) : INVALID_VFSUID;
> if (initial_idmapping(fs_userns))
> uid = __kuid_val(kuid);
> else
[Severity: High]
When make_vfsuid() and make_vfsgid() in fs/mnt_idmapping.c map a classic ID on
an idmapped mount, they return via VFSUIDT_INIT_RAW() and VFSGIDT_INIT_RAW():
fs/mnt_idmapping.c:
#define VFSUIDT_INIT_RAW(val) (vfsuid_t){ val }
#define VFSGIDT_INIT_RAW(val) (vfsgid_t){ val }
...
return VFSUIDT_INIT_RAW(map_id_down(&idmap->uid_map, uid));
Now that vfsuid_t and vfsgid_t in include/linux/mnt_idmapping.h have u32 type
as their first struct member, doesn't this positional initializer assign the
mapped 32-bit UID or GID to .type while zero-initializing .legacy and .uuid?
When VFS callers on an idmapped mount map an inode's classic ID through
i_uid_into_vfsuid() or i_gid_into_vfsgid() (such as acl_permission_check(),
inode_owner_or_capable(), may_follow_link(), chown_ok(), and
generic_fillattr()):
- Mapped ID 1 sets .type = KID_UUID with an all-zero UUID, and mapped ID 2
sets .type = KID_GUID with an all-zero GUID, allowing a caller with an
all-zero UUID or GUID credential to match files owned by mapped UID 1 or 2
in vfsuid_eq_kuid().
- Other non-zero mapped IDs set .type to an unknown tag with .legacy = 0, so
vfsuid_is_legacy() returns false and __vfsuid_val() returns (uid_t)-1.
- When map_id_down() returns (uid_t)-1 for an unmapped ID,
VFSUIDT_INIT_RAW((uid_t)-1) sets .type = (u32)-1, causing vfsuid_valid() and
vfsgid_valid() in include/linux/mnt_idmapping.h:
static inline bool vfsuid_valid(vfsuid_t uid)
{
return !vfsuid_is_legacy(uid) || __vfsuid_val(uid) != (uid_t)-1;
}
to see !vfsuid_is_legacy(uid) as true and treat unmapped IDs as valid.
Should VFSUIDT_INIT_RAW() and VFSGIDT_INIT_RAW() initialize
.type = KID_LEGACY and .legacy = (val) like KUIDT_INIT() and KGIDT_INIT()?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/include/linux/uidgid.h b/include/linux/uidgid.h
> index 182c682458cb6..e1adb50d5dac5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uidgid.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uidgid.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -64,64 +69,115 @@ static inline gid_t __kgid_val(kgid_t gid)
> #define INVALID_UID KUIDT_INIT(-1)
> #define INVALID_GID KGIDT_INIT(-1)
>
> +/*
> + * Ids are ordered by kind first (legacy ids before UUIDs before GUIDs),
> + * then by value: numerically for legacy ids, bytewise for the others.
> + * That keeps sorted id arrays and range checks between legacy ids
> + * working: a UUID is never inside a range of legacy ids.
> + */
> +static inline int __kid_cmp(u32 ltype, u32 llegacy, const u8 *lb,
> + u32 rtype, u32 rlegacy, const u8 *rb)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MULTIUSER))
> + return 0;
> + if (ltype != rtype)
> + return ltype < rtype ? -1 : 1;
> + if (ltype == KID_LEGACY)
> + return llegacy == rlegacy ? 0 : llegacy < rlegacy ? -1 : 1;
> + return __builtin_memcmp(lb, rb, UUID_SIZE);
> +}
[Severity: High]
How does this ordering interact with fib_rule_match() in net/core/fib_rules.c
when a socket is owned by a KID_UUID or KID_GUID user?
In net/core/fib_rules.c, FIB rules without an explicit FRA_UID_RANGE attribute
(including the default local, main, and default table rules added by
fib_default_rule_add() and rules created in fib_nl2rule()) initialize
rule->uid_range to fib_kuid_range_unset:
net/core/fib_rules.c:
static const struct fib_kuid_range fib_kuid_range_unset = {
KUIDT_INIT(0),
KUIDT_INIT(~0),
};
When policy routing is active and fib_rules_lookup() calls fib_rule_match(),
it checks fl->flowi_uid (populated from sk_uid(sk) in paths such as
build_sk_flow_key() in net/ipv4/route.c and ip6_route_output_flags() in
net/ipv6/route.c) unconditionally against rule->uid_range without checking
uid_range_set(&rule->uid_range):
net/core/fib_rules.c:fib_rule_match()
if (uid_lt(fl->flowi_uid, rule->uid_range.start) ||
uid_gt(fl->flowi_uid, rule->uid_range.end))
goto out;
Because __kid_cmp() orders KID_UUID and KID_GUID after all KID_LEGACY values,
uid_gt(fl->flowi_uid, fib_kuid_range_unset.end) will evaluate to true for any
UUID or GUID socket, rejecting all unset-UID rules (including the default
rules) and failing route lookups with -ESRCH (-ENETUNREACH).
[ ... ]
> +/* A hash of an id, for hash tables keyed by kuid_t or kgid_t */
> +static inline u32 __kid_hash(u32 type, u32 legacy, const u8 *b)
> +{
> + u32 w[4];
> +
> + if (type == KID_LEGACY)
> + return legacy;
> + __builtin_memcpy(w, b, sizeof(w));
> + return w[0] ^ w[1] ^ w[2] ^ w[3] ^ type;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 kuid_hash(kuid_t uid)
> +{
> + return __kid_hash(uid.type, __kuid_val(uid), uid.uuid.b);
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
When CONFIG_MULTIUSER is disabled, __kid_cmp() returns 0 unconditionally so
uid_eq() treats all kuid_t values as equal regardless of .type, whereas
__kid_hash() still hashes the UUID/GUID bytes when type != KID_LEGACY.
On a !CONFIG_MULTIUSER kernel, if an inode with a KID_UUID or KID_GUID owner
(e.g. from a mounted ext4 uid_r filesystem or via chown_r() / fchown_r() in
fs/open.c) and S_ISUID set is executed via execve(), bprm_fill_uid() in
fs/exec.c sets bprm->cred->euid to that UUID or GUID. When inc_ucount() ->
alloc_ucounts() -> find_ucounts() in kernel/ucount.c (or uidhashentry() in
kernel/user.c, or later fs/ecryptfs/messaging.c) hashes that kuid_t with
kuid_hash(), won't it land in a non-zero bucket, miss init_ucounts (hashed at
GLOBAL_ROOT_UID), and allocate duplicate ucounts structures even though
uid_eq(init_ucounts.uid, uid) is true?
Should __kid_hash() also return 0 when !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MULTIUSER)?
> +
> +static inline u32 kgid_hash(kgid_t gid)
> +{
> + return __kid_hash(gid.type, __kgid_val(gid), gid.uuid.b);
> +}
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_USER_NS
> @@ -134,13 +190,22 @@ extern gid_t from_kgid(struct user_namespace *to, kgid_t gid);
> extern uid_t from_kuid_munged(struct user_namespace *to, kuid_t uid);
> extern gid_t from_kgid_munged(struct user_namespace *to, kgid_t gid);
>
> +/*
> + * UUIDs and GUIDs aren't in any namespace's uid_map or gid_map: they
> + * exist in the initial user namespace only, and nobody has privilege
> + * over them through a capability in another one.
> + */
> static inline bool kuid_has_mapping(struct user_namespace *ns, kuid_t uid)
> {
> + if (!uid_is_legacy(uid))
> + return ns == &init_user_ns;
> return from_kuid(ns, uid) != (uid_t) -1;
> }
>
> static inline bool kgid_has_mapping(struct user_namespace *ns, kgid_t gid)
> {
> + if (!gid_is_legacy(gid))
> + return ns == &init_user_ns;
> return from_kgid(ns, gid) != (gid_t) -1;
> }
[Severity: High]
kuid_has_mapping() and kgid_has_mapping() (along with vfsuid_has_mapping() and
vfsgid_has_mapping() in include/linux/mnt_idmapping.h) are updated here
because from_kuid() and from_kgid() in kernel/user_namespace.c now return
(uid_t)-1 and (gid_t)-1 for UUID and GUID IDs even in init_user_ns.
However, qid_has_mapping() in include/linux/quota.h still checks:
include/linux/quota.h:
static inline bool qid_has_mapping(struct user_namespace *ns, struct kqid qid)
{
return from_kqid(ns, qid) != (qid_t) -1;
}
Because from_kqid() in fs/quota/kqid.c delegates to from_kuid() and
from_kgid(), qid_has_mapping(&init_user_ns, qid) now returns false for all
UUID and GUID kqid values.
Although the follow-up commit "fs: keep UUID and GUID owners off filesystems
that can't store them" restricts UUID and GUID owners to SB_I_UID_R
filesystems, tmpfs with CONFIG_TMPFS_QUOTA (enabled in "shmem, ramfs: allow
UUID and GUID owners") and ext4 (enabled in "ext4: add the uid_r feature for
UUID and GUID owners") both support VFS quotas and call dquot_initialize() and
dquot_transfer(). Furthermore, while "quota: don't account UUID and GUID
owners" adds a !qid_is_legacy(qid) check returning ERR_PTR(-ESRCH) in dqget()
in fs/quota/dquot.c, it places that check after:
fs/quota/dquot.c:dqget()
if (!qid_has_mapping(sb->s_user_ns, qid))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
without updating qid_has_mapping(). Doesn't this make the !qid_is_legacy(qid)
check unreachable and cause dqget() to return -EINVAL instead of -ESRCH,
breaking file creation (__ext4_new_inode(), shmem_get_inode()) and ownership
changes (ext4_setattr(), shmem_setattr()) for UUID and GUID owners whenever
quotas are active?
> diff --git a/include/linux/uidgid_types.h b/include/linux/uidgid_types.h
> index b35ac4955a334..0f595d075b4a2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uidgid_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uidgid_types.h
> @@ -3,13 +3,41 @@
> #define _LINUX_UIDGID_TYPES_H
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/uuid_types.h>
>
> +/*
> + * Kinds of kuid_t and kgid_t. KID_LEGACY is 0, so zeroed memory still
> + * holds GLOBAL_ROOT_UID and GLOBAL_ROOT_GID as it did when the ids were
> + * plain numbers. Userspace has its own numbering (UID_R_* in
> + * <uapi/linux/uidgid_r.h>), in which zero is "no id".
> + */
> +enum kid_type {
> + KID_LEGACY = 0, /* classic 32 bit id in .legacy */
> + KID_UUID, /* RFC 9562 UUID in .uuid */
> + KID_GUID, /* Microsoft GUID in .guid */
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Only the member .type selects is meaningful; the bytes of .uuid past
> + * .legacy are undefined for a KID_LEGACY id. Copy the whole struct and
> + * use the helpers of <linux/uidgid.h> to look at it.
> + */
> typedef struct {
> - uid_t val;
> + u32 type;
> + union {
> + uid_t legacy;
> + uuid_t uuid;
> + guid_t guid;
> + };
> } kuid_t;
[Severity: High]
Placing u32 type at offset 0 and uid_t legacy at offset 4 of kuid_t and kgid_t
changes the layout of the anonymous union in struct audit_field in
include/linux/audit.h:
include/linux/audit.h:
struct audit_field {
u32 type;
union {
u32 val;
kuid_t uid;
kgid_t gid;
struct {
char *lsm_str;
void *lsm_rule;
};
};
u32 op;
};
In kernel/auditfilter.c, audit_data_to_entry() populates f->uid = make_kuid()
or f->gid = make_kgid() for UID and GID filter fields (AUDIT_LOGINUID,
AUDIT_UID, AUDIT_EUID, AUDIT_SUID, AUDIT_FSUID, AUDIT_OBJ_UID, AUDIT_GID,
AUDIT_EGID, AUDIT_SGID, AUDIT_FSGID, AUDIT_OBJ_GID), which now writes
KID_LEGACY (0) at offset 0 and the numeric ID at offset 4.
When audit_krule_to_data() in kernel/auditfilter.c serializes rules back to
userspace for AUDIT_LIST_RULES:
kernel/auditfilter.c:audit_krule_to_data()
default:
data->values[i] = f->val;
}
none of those UID or GID fields have explicit cases in the switch statement,
so they all read f->val at offset 0 (f->uid.type == 0). Won't this cause
AUDIT_LIST_RULES to report 0 (root) for every UID and GID filter rule?
>
> typedef struct {
> - gid_t val;
> + u32 type;
> + union {
> + gid_t legacy;
> + uuid_t uuid;
> + guid_t guid;
> + };
> } kgid_t;
[Severity: High]
With kuid_t and kgid_t growing from 4 bytes to 20 bytes, reads and writes of
inode->i_uid and inode->i_gid are no longer single-word atomic and compile
into multi-instruction memory copies.
In the VFS, writers update inode->i_uid and inode->i_gid in place via
notify_change() -> setattr_copy() -> i_uid_update() / i_gid_update() in
include/linux/fs.h (holding only inode->i_rwsem), and via lookup_fast() ->
pid_revalidate() -> pid_update_inode() -> task_dump_owner() in fs/proc/base.c
(under rcu_read_lock() with no inode lock held):
include/linux/fs.h:
static inline void i_uid_update(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
const struct iattr *attr,
struct inode *inode)
{
if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_UID)
inode->i_uid = from_vfsuid(idmap, i_user_ns(inode),
attr->ia_vfsuid);
}
Meanwhile, lockless readers in acl_permission_check(), may_follow_link(),
may_create_in_sticky(), inode_owner_or_capable(), and generic_fillattr() copy
inode->i_uid and inode->i_gid by value through i_uid_into_vfsuid() and
i_gid_into_vfsgid() without holding inode->i_rwsem or any seqlock:
include/linux/fs.h:
static inline vfsuid_t i_uid_into_vfsuid(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
const struct inode *inode)
{
return make_vfsuid(idmap, i_user_ns(inode), inode->i_uid);
}
Can a concurrent reader racing with chown() / chown_r() or procfs task
revalidation observe a torn 20-byte ID—for example, .type == KID_LEGACY paired
with the first 4 bytes of a UUID/GUID in .legacy (which can match
GLOBAL_ROOT_UID or another local UID), or .type == KID_UUID / KID_GUID paired
with stale union bytes—or can concurrent pid_revalidate() calls leave a
/proc/<pid> inode's ownership permanently torn?
[Severity: Low]
Also, growing kuid_t and kgid_t to 20 bytes causes READ_ONCE() and
WRITE_ONCE() on kuid_t and kgid_t to fail compiletime_assert_rwonce_type() in
include/asm-generic/rwonce.h.
Unlike sk->sk_uid (which is converted to a seqcount in the later commit
"net: sock: read sk_uid through a seqcount"), drivers/net/tun.c still uses
READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() on tun->owner and tun->group in tun_fill_info()
and __tun_chr_ioctl():
drivers/net/tun.c:tun_fill_info()
kuid_t owner = READ_ONCE(tun->owner);
kgid_t group = READ_ONCE(tun->group);
drivers/net/tun.c:__tun_chr_ioctl()
WRITE_ONCE(tun->owner, owner);
...
WRITE_ONCE(tun->group, group);
Won't this break the build when CONFIG_TUN is enabled?
[ ... ]
> --
> 2.51.2
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1792552161.git.jan.koester@tuxist.de?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 3:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 3:15 [RFC PATCH v2 00/41] UUID and GUID user and group ids (*_r system calls) Jan Koester
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/41] uuid: move uuid_t and guid_t into <linux/uuid_types.h> Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/41] uapi: add <linux/uidgid_r.h> for 128 bit capable user and group ids Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/41] uidgid: add uid_is_legacy() and gid_is_legacy() Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/41] net: sock: read sk_uid through a seqcount Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/41] af_unix: keep sender ids in skb->cb only when they are classic ids Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/41] netlink: keep classic sender ids in skb->cb Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/41] Bluetooth: " Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/41] smb: client: use __kuid_val() for the unix SIDs of the caller Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/41] uidgid: let kuid_t and kgid_t hold a UUID or a GUID Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/41] uidgid: convert between kernel ids and the ids of the *_r system calls Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/41] fscrypt: show the whole uid in the description of user key claims Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/41] keys: name per-user keyrings of UUID and GUID users by the whole uid Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/41] ublk: refuse unprivileged devices to UUID and GUID users Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/41] nfsd: don't hand out uid 0 for read layouts of UUID-owned files Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/41] SUNRPC: name UUID and GUID users to gssd as uid_r= Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/41] ecryptfs: hash daemons by kuid_hash() Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/41] quota: don't account UUID and GUID owners Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/41] fs: keep UUID and GUID owners off filesystems that can't store them Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/41] cred: add the *_r variants of the get/set*id() system calls Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/41] groups: add getgroups_r() and setgroups_r() Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/41] fs: add chown_r(), lchown_r(), fchown_r() and fchownat_r() Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/41] arch: wire up the *_r uid and gid system calls Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/41] statx: report UUID and GUID owners Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/41] shmem, ramfs: allow " Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/41] uidgid: parse and print ids in their text form Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/41] proc: show UUID and GUID ids in status, accept them for loginuid Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/41] audit: log UUID and GUID ids in full Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/41] net: add SO_PEERCRED_R, SO_PEERGROUPS_R and SCM_CREDENTIALS_R Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/41] signal: report the sender's UUID or GUID uid in si_uid_r Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/41] ipc: add IPC_STAT_R and IPC_SET_R Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/41] ext4: add the uid_r feature for UUID and GUID owners Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/41] ext4: let uid_r be turned on while the filesystem is mounted Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/41] posix_acl: support UUID and GUID entries Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/41] ext4: store ACLs with UUID and GUID entries on uid_r filesystems Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 35/41] Documentation: describe UUID and GUID user and group ids Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 36/41] selftests: add tests for UUID and GUID ids Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 37/41] ovl: allow UUID and GUID owners when the upper layer does Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 38/41] devpts: allow UUID and GUID owners Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 39/41] ksmbd: log in UUID and GUID users and map them to SIDs Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 40/41] nfsd, nfs: carry UUID and GUID owners as their text form Jan Koester
2026-10-21 17:35 ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-22 2:52 ` Takeshi Nishimura
2026-10-22 3:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 41/41] Documentation: uid_r: describe SMB and NFSv4 Jan Koester
2026-10-22 3:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 3:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/41] UUID and GUID user and group ids (*_r system calls) jan Koester
2026-10-21 14:26 ` Adding dreaded Windows SID-style, or. Repeating history, the bad chapters. UUID/GUIDRe: " Lionel Cons
2026-10-22 17:00 ` Casey Schaufler
2026-10-22 18:26 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-180910@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jan.koester@tuxist.de \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox