Re: [PATCH 4/8] fs: introduce simple_new_inode

[Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>]

On 4/14/20 3:01 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 02:42:58PM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>> It is a common special case for new_inode to initialize the
>> time to the current time and the inode to get_next_ino().
>> Introduce a core function that does it and use it throughout
>> Linux.
> 
> Shouldn't this just be called new_inode_current_time()?
> 
> How is anyone going to remember what simple_new_inode() does to the
> inode structure?

I noticed that most functions in libfs.c are called "simple_*" when they 
do the right thing for the majority of simple use cases (e.g., 
simple_symlink_inode_operations or simple_dir_operations). I can 
certainly rename the function.

Thank you for all the feedback, I will incorporate it and send a new 
patch series soon.


Emanuele
> 
>> --- a/fs/libfs.c
>> +++ b/fs/libfs.c
>> @@ -595,6 +595,18 @@ int simple_write_end(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_write_end);
>>   
>> +struct inode *simple_new_inode(struct super_block *sb)
>> +{
>> +	struct inode *inode = new_inode(sb);
>> +	if (inode) {
>> +		inode->i_ino = get_next_ino();
>> +		inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime =
>> +			inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode);
>> +	}
>> +	return inode;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_new_inode);