From: "Michael Büsch" <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ssb: Clear RETRY_TIMEOUT in PCI Configuration
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:04:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1287522271.24543.4.camel@maggie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4cbddbab.aeEgjpVFDD9GDTuy%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20101019_195602_250035_FFFFFFFFB4BFE748)
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 12:55 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> MMIO log traces obtained using the Broadcom wl hybrid driver show that
> the RETRY_TIMEOUT register (0x41) in PCI configuration space is cleared
> if non-zero. Similar code found in other drivers such as ipw2100 show
> this operation is needed to keep PCI Tx retries from interfering with
> C3 CPU state. There are no known cases where omission of this code has
> caused a problem, but this patch is offered just in case such a situation
> occurs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> ---
>
> John,
>
> No particular urgency for this patch.
>
> Larry
> ---
>
> Index: wireless-testing/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c
> ===================================================================
> --- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c
> +++ wireless-testing/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c
> @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ int ssb_pcicore_plat_dev_init(struct pci
> static void ssb_pcicore_fixup_pcibridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> u8 lat;
> + u32 val;
>
> if (dev->bus->ops != &ssb_pcicore_pciops) {
> /* This is not a device on the PCI-core bridge. */
> @@ -288,6 +289,12 @@ static void ssb_pcicore_fixup_pcibridge(
> return;
> }
>
> + /* Disable the RETRY_TIMEOUT register (0x41) to keep
> + * PCI Tx retries from interfering with C3 CPU state */
> + pci_read_config_dword(pci_dev, 0x40, &val);
> + if ((val & 0x0000ff00) != 0)
> + pci_write_config_dword(pci_dev, 0x40, val & 0xffff00ff);
> +
> /* Enable PCI bridge BAR1 prefetch and burst */
> pci_write_config_dword(dev, SSB_BAR1_CONTROL, 3);
Hm, do you realize that this function will only be executed for PCI
devices that live on top of a native SSB bus? Is that intentional?
It won't affect normal broadcom wireless PCI devices.
It will only have an affect on a broadcom wireless PCI device that lives
behind a SSB->PCI bridge on an embedded device.
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-19 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-19 17:55 [PATCH] ssb: Clear RETRY_TIMEOUT in PCI Configuration Larry Finger
2010-10-19 18:02 ` John W. Linville
2010-10-19 18:21 ` Larry Finger
2010-10-19 21:04 ` Michael Büsch [this message]
2010-11-09 23:09 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-11-09 23:13 ` Michael Büsch
2010-11-10 17:37 ` John W. Linville
2010-11-10 21:52 ` Michael Büsch
2010-11-16 20:40 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1287522271.24543.4.camel@maggie \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).