From: "Michael Büsch" <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ssb: Save sprom image for dump of device at alternate location
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:38:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292168319.3572.6.camel@maggie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D04EB7D.1090009@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20101212_103356_973639_7B7006EC)
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 09:34 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 12/12/2010 02:45 AM, Michael B?sch wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 21:35 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> >> Some recent Broadcom devices in netbooks have an SPROM that is located
> >> at 0x0800, not the normal location of 0x1000. Initial reading of the
> >> SPROM has been solved in a previous commit; however, dumping to a console
> >> no longer works. This difficulty is fixed by saving the SPROM image
> >> from the initial read, and only freeing that memory at module unload.
> >
> > Ah wait. Now I get what you were talking about.
> > Yes, those devices map the SPROM into the wireless core window.
> > So, yes, the wireless core has to be mapped for the readout to work,
> > of course. I don't know what other prerequisites have to be met to
> > read the data. Maybe IHR region has to be disabled.
> > I don't know how writing works on these devices.
>
> I do not think it is worthwhile to bother to find out how to rewrite the SPROM.
> As long as we can read it in case of questions regarding content, that should be
> enough. In V2, I will return -ENOTSUP rather than -EINVAL as that is more
> appropriate.
So, do we actually make sure the wireless core is mapped while reading
SPROM from offset 0x800? I guess not and it just works by accident,
because the core is still mapped from a previous operation.
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-12 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-12 3:35 [PATCH 2/2] ssb: Save sprom image for dump of device at alternate location Larry Finger
2010-12-12 8:45 ` Michael Büsch
2010-12-12 15:34 ` Larry Finger
2010-12-12 15:38 ` Michael Büsch [this message]
2010-12-12 16:05 ` Larry Finger
2010-12-12 16:12 ` Michael Büsch
2010-12-12 9:03 ` Michael Büsch
2010-12-12 15:28 ` Larry Finger
2010-12-12 15:36 ` Michael Büsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1292168319.3572.6.camel@maggie \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).