From: "Michael Büsch" <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] bcmai: introduce AI driver
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 23:08:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302124112.20093.11.camel@maggie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimGSoYzp0Z4vyCS_H5PDKhgjYuLBA@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20110406_230206_684163_663F35B6)
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 23:01 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> W dniu 6 kwietnia 2011 22:57 u?ytkownik Michael B?sch <mb@bu3sch.de> napisa?:
> > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:42 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> >> 2011/4/6 Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>:
> >> > If we want to have two drivers working on two (different) cores
> >> > simultaneously, we will have to add trivial mutex to group core
> >> > switching with core operation (read/write).
> >>
> >> With a little of work we could avoid switching and mutexes on no-host
> >> boards. MMIO is not limited to one core at once in such a case.
> >
> > I don't think that this is a problem at all.
> > All that magic does happen inside of the bus I/O handlers.
> > Just like SSB does it.
> > From a driver point of view, the I/O functions just need to
> > be atomic.
> >
> > For SSB it's not always 100% atomic, but we're always safe
> > due to some assumptions being made. But this is an SSB implementation
> > detail that is different from AXI. So don't look too closely
> > at the SSB implementation of the I/O functions. You certainly want
> > to implement them slightly differently in AXI. SSB currently doesn't
> > make use of the additional sliding windows, because they are not
> > available in the majority of SSB devices.
> >
> > The AXI bus subsystem will manage the sliding windows and the driver
> > doesn't know about the details.
>
> Sure, I've meant mutex inside bcmai (or whatever name), not on the driver side!
>
> In BCMAI:
> bcmai_read() {
> mutex_get();
> switch_core();
> ioread();
> mutex_release();
> }
Yeah that basically is the idea. But it's a little bit harder than that.
The problem is that the mutex cannot be taken in interrupt context.
A spinlock probably is a bit hairy, too, depending on how heavy
a core switch is on AXI.
On SSB we workaround this with some (dirty but working) assumptions.
On AXI you probably can do lockless I/O, if you use the two windows
(how many windows are there?) in a clever way to avoid core switching
completely after the system was initialized.
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-06 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-05 19:57 [RFC][PATCH] bcmai: introduce AI driver Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-05 19:25 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-05 19:29 ` Michael Büsch
[not found] ` <1302032137.3969.10.camel@Joe-Laptop>
2011-04-05 20:15 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-05 20:25 ` Michael Büsch
2011-04-05 20:50 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <op.vtisojsk3ri7v4@arend-laptop>
2011-04-06 18:02 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <op.vti9ote53ri7v4@arend-laptop>
2011-04-06 20:40 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-06 20:42 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-06 20:57 ` Michael Büsch
2011-04-06 21:01 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-06 21:08 ` Michael Büsch [this message]
2011-04-06 21:12 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-06 21:20 ` Michael Büsch
[not found] ` <1302124737.27258.7.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua>
2011-04-06 23:20 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <1302134429.27258.32.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua>
2011-04-07 0:54 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-07 7:54 ` Michael Büsch
2011-04-07 9:55 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-08 16:56 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-08 17:09 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-08 17:14 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <op.vtmqm7fw3ri7v4@arend-laptop>
2011-04-08 17:27 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <op.vtmqujir3ri7v4@arend-laptop>
2011-04-08 17:31 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <20110410080159.GB2798@ucw.cz>
2011-04-10 8:05 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <20110410082420.GA1460@localhost.ucw.cz>
2011-04-10 8:30 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <op.vtpt6v173ri7v4@arend-laptop>
2011-04-10 11:32 ` Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302124112.20093.11.camel@maggie \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).