From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 23:56:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] b43: Mask out unwanted bits of RX slot address In-Reply-To: References: <1311114796.3062.9.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <1313113295.27274.53.camel@i7.infradead.org> <1313144109.27274.71.camel@i7.infradead.org> Message-ID: <1313276212.30099.0.camel@i7.infradead.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 00:13 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: > Interesting... below is the dump from ndiswrapper on BCM4331: > > R 4 1431.714843 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fb0 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.740035 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fc0 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.740050 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fc0 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.850216 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fd0 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.850229 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fd0 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.882151 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fe0 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.882164 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fe0 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.885822 2 0xb0600230 0x10000ff0 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.885835 2 0xb0600230 0x10000ff0 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.896775 2 0xb0600230 0x10000000 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.896790 2 0xb0600230 0x10000000 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.915842 2 0xb0600230 0x10000010 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.915857 2 0xb0600230 0x10000010 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.917399 2 0xb0600230 0x10000020 0x0 0 > R 4 1431.917413 2 0xb0600230 0x10000020 0x0 0 > > Broadcom uses bigger ring and they don't suffer from 0x1000 being ever > set. I've filled the ring few times, 0x1000 was never set on going > back to slot 0. What was the physical address of the ring for this test run? -- dwmw2