From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:50:55 +0100 Subject: [QUESTION] 4331 support In-Reply-To: <4E526BE6.3020504@lwfinger.net> References: <1314023603.21805.75.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <4E526BE6.3020504@lwfinger.net> Message-ID: <1314024656.21805.79.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 09:47 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > To expand a little on what David wrote, the tree at wireless-testing is ahead of > linux-next, and the published patches are even ahead of wireless-testing. The > situation is changing rapidly, but 4331 support is quite near. That's the way it's currently managed, yes. But in fact a 'b43' git tree wouldn't need to be based on wireless-testing most of the time, and certainly wouldn't need to be based on linux-next. It should be possible for it to be based on the latest release from Linus. -- dwmw2 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5818 bytes Desc: not available URL: