* [PATCH 3.2 1/2] Revert "b43: trivial: do not report any link quality instead of invalid one"
@ 2011-10-12 21:18 Rafał Miłecki
2011-10-12 21:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] b43: N-PHY: report signal to mac80211 Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <CA+icZUXzPSm8FdqMbAm34GEDVM-BADOwY==aYiUegd0uhEnACQ@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2011-10-12 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless, John W. Linville; +Cc: b43-dev, Rafał Miłecki
This reverts commit 55ad5962e97430c83d51df36fc18865ee4f78c48.
I assumed N is newer than LP, which isn't true. This regressed LP case.
Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
---
It seems that wasn't so "trivial", sorry for this regression :|
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c | 12 +++++-------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c
index 5f812d1..b8de62c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c
@@ -735,13 +735,11 @@ void b43_rx(struct b43_wldev *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, const void *_rxhdr)
}
/* Link quality statistics */
- if ((chanstat & B43_RX_CHAN_PHYTYPE) >= B43_PHYTYPE_N) {
- /*
- s8 rssi = max(rxhdr->power0, rxhdr->power1);
- TODO: Find out what the rssi value is (dBm or percentage?)
- and also find out what the maximum possible value is.
- Fill status.ssi and status.signal fields.
- */
+ if ((chanstat & B43_RX_CHAN_PHYTYPE) == B43_PHYTYPE_N) {
+// s8 rssi = max(rxhdr->power0, rxhdr->power1);
+ //TODO: Find out what the rssi value is (dBm or percentage?)
+ // and also find out what the maximum possible value is.
+ // Fill status.ssi and status.signal fields.
} else {
status.signal = b43_rssi_postprocess(dev, rxhdr->jssi,
(phystat0 & B43_RX_PHYST0_OFDM),
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] b43: N-PHY: report signal to mac80211
2011-10-12 21:18 [PATCH 3.2 1/2] Revert "b43: trivial: do not report any link quality instead of invalid one" Rafał Miłecki
@ 2011-10-12 21:18 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <CA+icZUXzPSm8FdqMbAm34GEDVM-BADOwY==aYiUegd0uhEnACQ@mail.gmail.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2011-10-12 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless, John W. Linville; +Cc: b43-dev, Rafał Miłecki
Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
---
John: do you think it is still possible to get this for 3.2?
---
drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.h | 10 +++++++++-
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c
index b8de62c..c73e860 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c
@@ -735,16 +735,22 @@ void b43_rx(struct b43_wldev *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, const void *_rxhdr)
}
/* Link quality statistics */
- if ((chanstat & B43_RX_CHAN_PHYTYPE) == B43_PHYTYPE_N) {
-// s8 rssi = max(rxhdr->power0, rxhdr->power1);
- //TODO: Find out what the rssi value is (dBm or percentage?)
- // and also find out what the maximum possible value is.
- // Fill status.ssi and status.signal fields.
- } else {
+ switch (chanstat & B43_RX_CHAN_PHYTYPE) {
+ case B43_PHYTYPE_N:
+ if (rxhdr->power0 == 16 || rxhdr->power0 == 32)
+ status.signal = max(rxhdr->power1, rxhdr->power2);
+ else
+ status.signal = max(rxhdr->power0, rxhdr->power1);
+ break;
+ case B43_PHYTYPE_A:
+ case B43_PHYTYPE_B:
+ case B43_PHYTYPE_G:
+ case B43_PHYTYPE_LP:
status.signal = b43_rssi_postprocess(dev, rxhdr->jssi,
(phystat0 & B43_RX_PHYST0_OFDM),
(phystat0 & B43_RX_PHYST0_GAINCTL),
(phystat3 & B43_RX_PHYST3_TRSTATE));
+ break;
}
if (phystat0 & B43_RX_PHYST0_OFDM)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.h b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.h
index f6e8bc4..16c514d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.h
@@ -248,7 +248,15 @@ struct b43_rxhdr_fw4 {
__s8 power1; /* PHY RX Status 1: Power 1 */
} __packed;
} __packed;
- __le16 phy_status2; /* PHY RX Status 2 */
+ union {
+ /* RSSI for N-PHYs */
+ struct {
+ __s8 power2;
+ PAD_BYTES(1);
+ } __packed;
+
+ __le16 phy_status2; /* PHY RX Status 2 */
+ } __packed;
__le16 phy_status3; /* PHY RX Status 3 */
union {
/* Tested with 598.314, 644.1001 and 666.2 */
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3.2 1/2] Revert "b43: trivial: do not report any link quality instead of invalid one"
[not found] ` <CA+icZUXzPSm8FdqMbAm34GEDVM-BADOwY==aYiUegd0uhEnACQ@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2011-10-13 4:38 ` Rafał Miłecki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2011-10-13 4:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sedat.dilek; +Cc: linux-wireless, John W. Linville, b43-dev
W dniu 13 pa?dziernika 2011 00:22 u?ytkownik Sedat Dilek
<sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> napisa?:
> 2011/10/12 Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>:
>> This reverts commit 55ad5962e97430c83d51df36fc18865ee4f78c48.
>>
>> I assumed N is newer than LP, which isn't true. This regressed LP case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> It seems that wasn't so "trivial", sorry for this regression :|
>> ---
>> ?drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c | ? 12 +++++-------
>> ?1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c
>> index 5f812d1..b8de62c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/xmit.c
>> @@ -735,13 +735,11 @@ void b43_rx(struct b43_wldev *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, const void *_rxhdr)
>> ? ? ? ?}
>>
>> ? ? ? ?/* Link quality statistics */
>> - ? ? ? if ((chanstat & B43_RX_CHAN_PHYTYPE) >= B43_PHYTYPE_N) {
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /*
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? s8 rssi = max(rxhdr->power0, rxhdr->power1);
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? TODO: Find out what the rssi value is (dBm or percentage?)
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? and also find out what the maximum possible value is.
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Fill status.ssi and status.signal fields.
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? */
>> + ? ? ? if ((chanstat & B43_RX_CHAN_PHYTYPE) == B43_PHYTYPE_N) {
>> +// ? ? ? ? ? ? s8 rssi = max(rxhdr->power0, rxhdr->power1);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? //TODO: Find out what the rssi value is (dBm or percentage?)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? // ? ? ?and also find out what the maximum possible value is.
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? // ? ? ?Fill status.ssi and status.signal fields.
>> ? ? ? ?} else {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?status.signal = b43_rssi_postprocess(dev, rxhdr->jssi,
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(phystat0 & B43_RX_PHYST0_OFDM),
>> --
>> 1.7.3.4
>>
>
> Commenting style?
> Isn't C99-like commenting not well seen?
This is simple revert, the code was like that before my patch.
My 2/2 patch remove that ugly commenting style.
--
Rafa?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-13 4:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-12 21:18 [PATCH 3.2 1/2] Revert "b43: trivial: do not report any link quality instead of invalid one" Rafał Miłecki
2011-10-12 21:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] b43: N-PHY: report signal to mac80211 Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <CA+icZUXzPSm8FdqMbAm34GEDVM-BADOwY==aYiUegd0uhEnACQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-10-13 4:38 ` [PATCH 3.2 1/2] Revert "b43: trivial: do not report any link quality instead of invalid one" Rafał Miłecki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).