From: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ssb: Clear RETRY_TIMEOUT in PCI Configuration
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:37:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101110173725.GA2714@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289344415.11453.1.camel@maggie>
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:13:35AM +0100, Michael B?sch wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 00:09 +0100, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> > 2010/10/19 Michael B?sch <mb@bu3sch.de>:
> > > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 12:55 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > >> MMIO log traces obtained using the Broadcom wl hybrid driver show that
> > >> the RETRY_TIMEOUT register (0x41) in PCI configuration space is cleared
> > >> if non-zero. Similar code found in other drivers such as ipw2100 show
> > >> this operation is needed to keep PCI Tx retries from interfering with
> > >> C3 CPU state. There are no known cases where omission of this code has
> > >> caused a problem, but this patch is offered just in case such a situation
> > >> occurs.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> John,
> > >>
> > >> No particular urgency for this patch.
> > >>
> > >> Larry
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> Index: wireless-testing/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c
> > >> ===================================================================
> > >> --- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c
> > >> +++ wireless-testing/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c
> > >> @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ int ssb_pcicore_plat_dev_init(struct pci
> > >> static void ssb_pcicore_fixup_pcibridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > >> {
> > >> u8 lat;
> > >> + u32 val;
> > >>
> > >> if (dev->bus->ops != &ssb_pcicore_pciops) {
> > >> /* This is not a device on the PCI-core bridge. */
> > >> @@ -288,6 +289,12 @@ static void ssb_pcicore_fixup_pcibridge(
> > >> return;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> + /* Disable the RETRY_TIMEOUT register (0x41) to keep
> > >> + * PCI Tx retries from interfering with C3 CPU state */
> > >> + pci_read_config_dword(pci_dev, 0x40, &val);
> > >> + if ((val & 0x0000ff00) != 0)
> > >> + pci_write_config_dword(pci_dev, 0x40, val & 0xffff00ff);
> > >> +
> > >> /* Enable PCI bridge BAR1 prefetch and burst */
> > >> pci_write_config_dword(dev, SSB_BAR1_CONTROL, 3);
> > >
> > >
> > > Hm, do you realize that this function will only be executed for PCI
> > > devices that live on top of a native SSB bus? Is that intentional?
> > >
> > > It won't affect normal broadcom wireless PCI devices.
> > > It will only have an affect on a broadcom wireless PCI device that lives
> > > behind a SSB->PCI bridge on an embedded device.
> >
> > Is this patch needed? Shouldn't this be replaced by second version
> > affecting "normal devices"?
> >
> > I can see both applied to wireless-testing.
>
> They certainly should _not_ be applied both.
> John, some fixing is needed. Please remove this patch.
Does the other patch handle this case (i.e. devices behind SSB->PCI
bridge)? If so, can you explain how? It looks to me like the code
in ssb_pcihost_register is only called for PCI-attached b43 (or b44)
devices.
Or are you saying the RETRY_TIMEOUT change is inappropriate for a
device behind an SSB->PCI bridge?
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville at tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-10 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-19 17:55 [PATCH] ssb: Clear RETRY_TIMEOUT in PCI Configuration Larry Finger
2010-10-19 18:02 ` John W. Linville
2010-10-19 18:21 ` Larry Finger
2010-10-19 21:04 ` Michael Büsch
2010-11-09 23:09 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-11-09 23:13 ` Michael Büsch
2010-11-10 17:37 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2010-11-10 21:52 ` Michael Büsch
2010-11-16 20:40 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101110173725.GA2714@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).