From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John W. Linville Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:39:25 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2 00/11] bcma: add support for embedded devices like bcm4716 In-Reply-To: <4E2933A0.40200@hauke-m.de> References: <1310835342-18877-1-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> <4E2933A0.40200@hauke-m.de> Message-ID: <20110722133925.GA10938@tuxdriver.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hauke Mehrtens Cc: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, jonas.gorski@gmail.com, mb@bu3sch.de, george@znau.edu.ua, arend@broadcom.com, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, bernhardloos@googlemail.com, arnd@arndb.de, julian.calaby@gmail.com, sshtylyov@mvista.com On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:24:00AM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 07/22/2011 12:30 AM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: > > 2011/7/16 Hauke Mehrtens : > >> @Ralf: Could you please merger this into the mips tree so that it will be in linux-3.1. > > > > ML for bcma is linux-wireless. Should we pass that patches "via" Ralf > > or John? Using linux-wireless (and John's tree) makes more sense to > > me, as we will work on the same tree and will get less merge > > conflicts. However don't take me as Linux development style guru, just > > my POV. > I talked about this with Florian Fainelli and he said that the patches > should rather pass Ralf then John, but merging would be easier when they > are passing John. I do not have a problem with both solutions and > rebasing it to an other tree is no problem for me. > John and Ralf, who wants to take these patches? ;-) I don't really care -- I figured Ralf was taking them due to the MIPS arch bits. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville at tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.