From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John W. Linville Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:04:24 -0400 Subject: [RFC][RFT][PATCH V2 2/2] b43: fix DMA on some bugged hardware In-Reply-To: References: <1313001339-11211-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <1313001339-11211-2-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <4E435D0E.80702@lwfinger.net> Message-ID: <20110811160424.GC2566@tuxdriver.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: Larry Finger , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:05:19AM +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: > W dniu 11 sierpnia 2011 06:39 u?ytkownik Larry Finger > napisa?: > > On 08/10/2011 07:14 PM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: > >> > >> W dniu 10 sierpnia 2011 20:35 u?ytkownik Rafa? Mi?ecki > >> ?napisa?: > >>> > >>> Some hardware with 64-bit DMA uses lower address word for setting > >>> routing (translation) bit. Add workaround for such boards. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki > >>> --- > >>> This requires testing on at least 1 normal 64-bit DMA card and 1 32-bit > >>> DMA card. So far it was tested only on my 14e4:4329 where it fixed DMA. > >> > >> 14e4:4353 (BCM43224), 64-bit DMA, still works :) > >> > >> The rest will follow tomorrow. > > > > Tested with 14e4:4311 (64-bit) and 14e4:4318 (32-bit). The ssb changes were > > also tested with b43legacy. > > Thanks Larry. > > I've additionally tested this on 14e4:4312 (BCM4311), 32-bit DMA. Works OK. > > John: please take this patchset. Are these fixes intended for 3.1? -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville at tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.