From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Vine Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:19:58 +0100 Subject: b43 error under heavy load In-Reply-To: References: <4CEAB969.20702@lwfinger.net> <1290451982.20888.2.camel@maggie> <4CEAC095.7020706@lwfinger.net> <4DC9853A.1090508@lwfinger.net> <20110601114839.433ae42d@boulder.homenet> <20110601130842.077da1c3@boulder.homenet> <20110601160101.75e30b3d@boulder.homenet> <20110601184931.499557c6@boulder.homenet> <20110814214626.4413d7cf@boulder.homenet> Message-ID: <20110814221958.6e7a4264@boulder.homenet> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: Larry Finger , wireless , Michael =?ISO-8859-1?B?QvxzY2g=?= , b43-dev On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:54:20 +0200 Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: > I didn't expect improvement, I tried to make it worse :P I though our > problems may be coming from not-fast-enough reading RX ring. So you > just made that ring even smaller to allow faster/easier errors. > > What do you mean by different errors? The only one I can see is > "b43-phy0 ERROR: PHY transmission error". Do you mean that or > something else? Did you post all the log you wanted to? Maybe missed > beginning? That's it. On your question "what do you mean by different errors", I mean the reported errors are different. Without that patch the reported error is: b43-phy0 debug: TX-status contains invalid cookie: 0x0DCE b43-phy0 debug: Out of order TX status report on DMA ring 1. Expected 74, but got 76 b43-phy0 debug: Out of order TX status report on DMA ring 1. Expected 74, but got 78 ... and so on. Chris