From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael =?UTF-8?B?QsO8c2No?= Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:47:24 +0200 Subject: b43 licensing In-Reply-To: References: <20130610190035.4b81072b@milhouse> Message-ID: <20130610204724.161ef6d5@milhouse> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 01:39:22 +0800 Ma Xiaojun wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Michael B?sch wrote: > > haha. Ubuntu people complaining about nonfree firmware. How many nonfree packages > > do they ship? > > The difference is: > http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=bcmwl-kernel-source > http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=linux-firmware-nonfree > > You see restricted VS multiverse. > > Probably when Canonical get some law suit, they are argue that > multiverse stuff is done by the community so that they don't need to > take the blame. I don't get it. So put it into restricted, multiverse or wherever you like. Where is the problem? In fact, you do _not_ even have to put it somewhere. Just provide a script that downloads it on demand from somewhere else. -- Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: