From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael =?UTF-8?B?QsO8c2No?= Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 17:17:21 +0200 Subject: [RFC][PATCH] b43: drop SSB dependency In-Reply-To: <1399733088-26607-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> References: <1399733088-26607-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20140510171721.54b21a63@wiggum> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , b43-dev@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 10 May 2014 16:44:48 +0200 Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: > config B43_BCMA > - bool "Support for BCMA bus" > - depends on B43 && (BCMA = y || BCMA = B43) > - default y > + bool > + depends on B43 A dependency on a purely selected option is ignored. So I think you can remove this one as well. > config B43_SSB > bool > - depends on B43 && (SSB = y || SSB = B43) > - default y > + depends on B43 Same here. > +choice > + prompt "Supported bus types" > + depends on B43 > + default B43_BCMA_AND_SSB > + > +config B43_BUSES_BCMA_AND_SSB > + bool "BCMA and SSB" > + depends on BCMA_POSSIBLE && SSB_POSSIBLE I think this needs to be: depends on (BCMA_POSSIBLE && (BCMA = y || BCMA = B43)) && (SSB_POSSIBLE && (SSB = y || SSB = B43)) to avoid the case where b43 is y and ssb or bcma is m. Or did I miss something and this is caught elsewhere? > + select B43_BCMA > + select B43_SSB > + > +config B43_BUSES_BCMA > + bool "BCMA only" > + depends on BCMA_POSSIBLE Similar here. > + select B43_BCMA > + > +config B43_BUSES_SSB > + bool "SSB only" > + depends on SSB_POSSIBLE And here. > + select B43_SSB > + > +endchoice -- Michael. ---- Please use PGP/GPG encryption. Key-ID: F532BE1D908D8B0E -------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: