public inbox for b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Büsch" <m@bues.ch>
To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: b43-fwcutter: add helper script for getting firmware
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 23:35:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140801233556.7a117cf1@wiggum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACna6ryu_Gw_sF2ec9ZkSoh=cLrX1T2FTt_2s+qkGNzWUcDnwg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 23:26:55 +0200
Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:

> No heuristics. Extracting any passed archive and looking for binary
> objects in it would *surly* contain some bugs.
> 
> We update binaries (lwfinger.com/b43-firmware/) rarely, once a year
> maybe? So having a simple checksum of .tar.bz2 should make the trick.
> I need to know which archive I'm dealing with to know the location of
> .o file only.

I completely agree here.

> > And on the online-functionality:
> > How do you detect which firmware to download? Note that I thought
> > about this in the early bcm43xx days, too. The driver had special
> > versioned MODULE_FIRMWARE markers (that we removed last year or so,
> > because they were horribly outdated), so that an automatic tool
> > could decide what firmware to download. Are you going to decide
> > by kernel version? What for patched/backported kernels? The plain
> > firmware file names from the remaining MODULE_FIRMWAREs probably
> > isn't enough information.
> 
> Do you think about problem of using new version of script with old
> kernel? Like using a fresh script wild old kernel that e.g. didn't
> support firmware rev 598+?

Yes.

> What about handling it in a kernel? If we ever start supporting new,
> backward incompatible, version of firmware, maybe we should use
> something like a /lib/firmware/b43-v123/?

Yes, we should _have_ done this. But we didn't.
We could simply ignore old incompatible kernels and in future do this:

> In such situation we could make script prepare both:
> /lib/firmware/b43/
> and
> /lib/firmware/b43-v123/
> 
> Script wouldn't need to check for the current kernel then. And user
> could switch between kernels without changing user space.
> 
> Does it make sense?

sure.
Do symbolic links to directories work for firmware fetching (Need to check 
both udev and in-kernel mechanisms)

-- 
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/b43-dev/attachments/20140801/38c5c365/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-01 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-01 17:41 b43-fwcutter: add helper script for getting firmware Rafał Miłecki
2014-08-01 18:44 ` Michael Büsch
2014-08-01 21:26   ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-08-01 21:35     ` Michael Büsch [this message]
2014-08-01 22:29       ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-02-18 10:03 ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-02-18 16:37   ` Michael Büsch
2015-02-18 17:26   ` Larry Finger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140801233556.7a117cf1@wiggum \
    --to=m@bues.ch \
    --cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox