From: Alessio Ferri <alessio.ferri@mythread.it>
To: Luca Casati <luk00casati@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next v2 1/5] b43: N-PHY: fix the TX tone sample table
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 23:12:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261106231202.00004c8b@mythread.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106211516.273791-2-luk00casati@gmail.com>
Il giorno Fri, 6 Nov 2026 22:15:12 +0100
Luca Casati <luk00casati@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> b43_nphy_load_samples() masked with (0x3FF << 10) instead of shifting
> the masked I value, and b43_nphy_gen_load_samples() fed
> cordic_calc_iq() a 16.16 fixed-point angle (CORDIC_FIXED() of a value
> already shifted by 16) held in a u16, while the function takes whole
> degrees. Together the sample table ended up all zeros, so every
> calibration that plays a test tone (TX IQ/LO, RX IQ) ran without a
> signal.
>
> Compute the rotation in whole degrees as brcmsmac does and fix the
> precedence.
>
> Tested on a BCM43228 (N-PHY rev 16, radio 2057 rev 9).
>
> mmiotraces: https://github.com/Luca00casati/b43patch/blob/755c2d8/traces/excerpts/patch1-tone-table.txt
>
> Found and fixed with the help of an AI coding assistant (Claude Opus
> 5.5), by comparing mmiotraces of b43 and wl on the same card.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Casati <luk00casati@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c index
> bbc30cbad..c4e6c1ac0 100644 ---
> a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c +++
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c @@ -1515,7 +1515,7 @@
> static int b43_nphy_load_samples(struct b43_wldev *dev,
> b43_nphy_stay_in_carrier_search(dev, 1);
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> - data[i] = (samples[i].i & 0x3FF << 10);
> + data[i] = (samples[i].i & 0x3FF) << 10;
> data[i] |= samples[i].q & 0x3FF;
> }
True, this is a precedence mistake, the shift binds before the masking.
> b43_ntab_write_bulk(dev, B43_NTAB32(17, 0), len, data);
> @@ -1531,7 +1531,8 @@ static u16 b43_nphy_gen_load_samples(struct
> b43_wldev *dev, u32 freq, u16 max, bool test)
> {
> int i;
> - u16 bw, len, rot, angle;
> + u16 bw, len;
> + s32 rot, angle;
> struct cordic_iq *samples;
>
> bw = b43_is_40mhz(dev) ? 40 : 20;
> @@ -1554,11 +1555,11 @@ static u16 b43_nphy_gen_load_samples(struct
> b43_wldev *dev, u32 freq, u16 max, b43err(dev->wl, "allocation for
> samples generation failed\n"); return 0;
> }
> - rot = (((freq * 36) / bw) << 16) / 100;
> + rot = ((freq * 36) / bw) / 100;
> angle = 0;
>
Correct, although changing the type of rot is not strictly needed.
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> - samples[i] = cordic_calc_iq(CORDIC_FIXED(angle));
> + samples[i] = cordic_calc_iq(angle);
> angle += rot;
> samples[i].q = CORDIC_FLOAT(samples[i].q * max);
> samples[i].i = CORDIC_FLOAT(samples[i].i * max);
cordic_calc_iq calls CORDIC_FIXED(theta) as the first operation, so in
the original code that would be equivalent to CORDIC_FIXED(
CORDIC_FIXED(angle) ), which is zero.
Reviewed-by: Alessio Ferri <alessio.ferri@mythread.it>
Regards
Alessio
_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 21:15 [PATCH wireless-next v2 0/5] b43: N-PHY: fix calibrations on rev7+ (BCM43228) Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 1/5] b43: N-PHY: fix the TX tone sample table Luca Casati
2026-11-06 22:12 ` Alessio Ferri [this message]
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 2/5] b43: N-PHY: fix TX IQ/LO calibration Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 3/5] b43: N-PHY: fix rev3+ RSSI calibration Luca Casati
2026-11-07 12:00 ` Alessio Ferri
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 4/5] b43: N-PHY: use wl's delays in the 2057 RC calibration Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 5/5] b43: N-PHY: add the missing override to the rev7 TX_PU command Luca Casati
2026-11-07 11:48 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 0/5] b43: N-PHY: fix calibrations on rev7+ (BCM43228) Alessio Ferri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261106231202.00004c8b@mythread.it \
--to=alessio.ferri@mythread.it \
--cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luk00casati@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox