From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Switching to 4.174.64.19 firmware for G-PHY cards?
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:52:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6FB948.2000902@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=nPjvDvN+EF08oey=PCKWH0=u2R0X813-GNsnh@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/03/2011 01:55 AM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> 824 line is:
> [struct b43_dmaring *]ring = kzalloc(sizeof(*ring), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Does anyone know why sometime we allocate 60b and sometimes 96b? It's
> always the same struct... :| Could be STA vs. AP related but... how? I
> don't see a way.
It depends on whether CONFIG_B43_DEBUG is defined.
As you hint at later, Chris's memory problem is not due to a direct allocation
problem, but is due to indirect allocation of skb or some other type of buffer.
Why they leak on his system, and not on mine is a puzzle.
Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-03 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-07 12:21 Switching to 4.174.64.19 firmware for G-PHY cards? Rafał Miłecki
2010-12-07 12:28 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-12-07 15:32 ` Larry Finger
2010-12-07 19:21 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2011-03-01 13:33 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-02 0:11 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02 0:20 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-02 3:30 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02 9:58 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-02 10:52 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-02 11:22 ` Jonas Gorski
2011-03-02 12:20 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02 22:00 ` Larry Finger
2011-03-02 23:02 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-03 4:43 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-03 7:58 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-03 11:50 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-03 23:49 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-07 12:35 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-04 0:37 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-07 12:26 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-08 1:12 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-07 13:12 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-07 16:41 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-08 1:25 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-08 13:26 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-09 0:44 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-09 0:47 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-09 0:47 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-03 4:55 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02 23:00 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02 12:14 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02 13:12 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-02 23:12 ` Jonas Gorski
2011-03-03 3:40 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-03 7:55 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-03 15:52 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2011-03-03 5:34 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-03 4:23 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02 10:08 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-02 12:17 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-03 3:44 ` chris at martin.cc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D6FB948.2000902@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).