From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Larry Finger Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:43:06 -0500 Subject: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues)) In-Reply-To: <20120608183339.78a7fcbd@milhouse> References: <1339167160.4901.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339168452.5748.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339168600.5748.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4FD21C6B.5000402@lwfinger.net> <1339170182.5748.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339170287.5748.8.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339170510.5748.9.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339170742.5748.10.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339171159.5748.11.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4FD22727.7000500@lwfinger.net> <1339172904.5748.18.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <20120608183339.78a7fcbd@milhouse> Message-ID: <4FD239AA.9090708@lwfinger.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_B=FCsch?= Cc: Johannes Berg , Andre Heider , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org On 06/08/2012 11:33 AM, Michael B?sch wrote: > > Larry, did you check with PIO? No, I only used DMA. With the latest patch, compilation is Ok, and DMA works for both kinds of firmware, while PIO fails for both. Larry