From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Huehn Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 22:33:42 +0200 Subject: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: Remove control.sta from struct ieee80211_tx_info and restructure tx-path In-Reply-To: <1342530237.8139.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> References: <1342205545-45382-1-git-send-email-thomas@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> <1342205545-45382-3-git-send-email-thomas@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> (sfid-20120713_205245_114771_49FF4AC7) <1342518290.7427.9.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <5005613F.1000004@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> <1342530237.8139.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Message-ID: <5005CC26.6090408@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Johannes Berg Cc: coelho@ti.com, brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com, ilw@linux.intel.com, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, chunkeey@googlemail.com, dsd@gentoo.org, buytenh@wantstofly.org Hi Johannes, > No, I'm not going to play that game. Make sure it compiles on > wireless-next. Virtual box did the job and I found 3 drivers that somehow did not complain in my OpenWRT build env... thx for not playing :)... v3 is out. I used wireless-testing and not -next,as in -next the necessary patch for mwlk8 is not included but in -testing. So my general question is on which tree to develop, on testing or next? Greetings Thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > b43-dev mailing list > b43-dev at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev