From: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Extracting (boardvendor and) boardtype
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:45:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51484FDA.1010706@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACna6ryfvb4P2CefYgqyzMmb_GxiMdyL+YiFZ_VrGu631=n2LQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/19/2013 12:37 PM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> 2013/3/19 Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>:
>> On 03/19/2013 12:18 PM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
>>>
>>> 2013/3/19 Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org>:
>>>>
>>>> On 19 March 2013 11:36, Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> However take a look at siutils.c you're using internally at Broadcom.
>>>>> I've found it in:
>>>>> GPL_RT_AC66U_3004270/asuswrt/release/src-rt-6.x/shared/siutils.c
>>>>> This file contains si_nvram_process. This function calls that
>>>>> si_getdevpathintvar and getintvar I'm not sure about. Does
>>>>> si_nvram_process prefer SPROM's boardtype (offset SROM_SSID==0x2 or
>>>>> offset SSB_SPROM1_SPID==0x4) if it's available (not 0xFFFF)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The getdevpathintvar and getintvar are for extracting these values
>>>> from nvram instead of SPROM - remember that embedded bcm47xx devices
>>>> are "sprom"-less and have these values stored in nvram. Since there is
>>>> only one global nvram, you need to prefix these values with the
>>>> "pci/sb" device path to differentiate if you have more than one wifi
>>>> chip (e.g. "sb/1/boardflags" or "pci/1/boardflags"). But this isn't
>>>> necessarily done for single wifi devices, hence the getdevpathintvar
>>>> -> getinvar path (as the fall back).
>>>
>>>
>>> So what function does Broadcom use to extract something from SPROM?
>>
>> srom_var_init()
>
> OK, so for PCI:
> 1) srom_var_init calls initvars_srom_pci
> 2) initvars_srom_pci calls _initvars_srom_pci
> 3) _initvars_srom_pci calls varbuf_append for every entry
>
> After all we end up with varbuf_t variable filled like an NVRAM
> (foo=bar\0baz=qux\0).
>
> So AFAIU getdevpathintvar and getintvar are still used to access SPROM
> (just in a form common for NVRAM), is that right?
>
> If the above is right, in si_nvram_process we access SPROM (with the
> use of getdevpathintvar/getintvar). So it seems in si_nvram_process we
> always prefer "boardtype", no matter if it comes from SPROM of NVRAM.
> Is that correct?
>
Yes. Non-volatile variables take precedence to PCI config info
regardless from which device, SPROM or flash, it was loaded.
Gr. AvS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 9:48 Extracting (boardvendor and) boardtype Rafał Miłecki
2013-03-19 10:19 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-03-19 10:36 ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-03-19 11:03 ` Jonas Gorski
2013-03-19 11:18 ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-03-19 11:22 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-03-19 11:37 ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-03-19 11:45 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2013-03-19 11:47 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-03-19 11:52 ` Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51484FDA.1010706@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).