From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 15:08:18 +0300 Subject: [QUESTION] 4331 support In-Reply-To: <1314024656.21805.79.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> (David Woodhouse's message of "Mon\, 22 Aug 2011 15\:50\:55 +0100") References: <1314023603.21805.75.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <4E526BE6.3020504@lwfinger.net> <1314024656.21805.79.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Message-ID: <87ty93m4zx.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org David Woodhouse writes: > On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 09:47 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: >> To expand a little on what David wrote, the tree at wireless-testing is ahead of >> linux-next, and the published patches are even ahead of wireless-testing. The >> situation is changing rapidly, but 4331 support is quite near. > > That's the way it's currently managed, yes. But in fact a 'b43' git tree > wouldn't need to be based on wireless-testing most of the time, and > certainly wouldn't need to be based on linux-next. > > It should be possible for it to be based on the latest release from > Linus. But then it would not contain all the changes in wireless-testing. -- Kalle Valo