b43-dev.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chris at martin.cc <chris@martin.cc>
To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Switching to 4.174.64.19 firmware for G-PHY cards?
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 23:14:52 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim4XtL9+2mw7Kx_Cu_LXak8Y6a_CgkwtrUHf_bo@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikmckvf3K-KEF7h0L-2mx-N5eQyapaF8fJiYrbs@mail.gmail.com>

2011/3/2 Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>
> W dniu 2 marca 2011 04:30 u?ytkownik chris at martin.cc <chris@martin.cc> napisa?:
> > 2011/3/2 chris at martin.cc <chris@martin.cc>
> >>
> >> As one of the people why reported some of these issues, I am going to take it upon my self to
> >> test the current b43 firmware with an ASUS WL500pv2. ?This uses the Broadcom 5354 SoC and > has a LP-PHY with Both the stable(4.150.10.5) and experimental?(4.178.10.4)?firmware.
> >
> > OK. ?I managed that faster that I expected
> > I tested the latest (fresh checkout) of OpenWrt backfire 10.03
> > I can confirm that when using the broadcom 5354 SoC (LP-PHY) that the
> > experimental??(4.178.10.4)?firmware. causes "oom" errors.
> > I repeated tests with both stable and experimental with the same
> > configuration and the
> > experimental version always caused "oom"
> >
> > happy to test anything else as needed. ?I currently have the stable
> > version under a load test
> >
> > The following is the first "iteration" of the log - as up can see the
> > firmware is loaded.
> > The radio interface is added to the bridge and ?moved to the
> > forwarding state, then POW.
> >
> > b43-phy0: Loading firmware version 478.104 (2008-07-01 00:50:23)
> > b43-phy0: Loading firmware version 478.104 (2008-07-01 00:50:23)
> > device wlan0 entered promiscuous mode
> > br-lan: port 2(wlan0) entering forwarding state
> > hotplug2 invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x80d0, order=0, oom_adj=0
>
> Thanks for your tests!
>
> I really need some help now. Does anyone have idea how changing
> firmware can cause out of memory on host? I try to imagine some
> reasons...
> 1) We detect some problem with hw/fw (correctly or not) and go into
> some infinity recursion
> 2) Newer firmware does sth differently with DMA, we allocate too much?
> OK, there is not even point "3" from me. I have no more ideas :|
>
> I could check than new vs. old firmware on my only LP-PHY, but how can
> I check for memory allocated by module? lsmod displays column "size"
> but I don't think it's about memory.
>

I did look in the source and found that there where 3 locations that
kmalloc() was called,
I added a printk(KERN_CRIT), just before each so I could determine so
that it would be displayed on the console.
But I didn't get anything.  So it must be in a tight loop.  And I'm
pretty sure that it is triggered by a packet being sent to the radio
from the bridge.
I did notice that there was some debug options so I will have a look
at that tomorrow.

----------------------------------------------------------
Chris Martin
m: +61 419 812 371
----------------------------------------------------------

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-02 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-07 12:21 Switching to 4.174.64.19 firmware for G-PHY cards? Rafał Miłecki
2010-12-07 12:28 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-12-07 15:32   ` Larry Finger
2010-12-07 19:21     ` Hauke Mehrtens
2011-03-01 13:33       ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-02  0:11         ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02  0:20           ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-02  3:30           ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02  9:58             ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-02 10:52               ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-02 11:22                 ` Jonas Gorski
2011-03-02 12:20                 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02 22:00                   ` Larry Finger
2011-03-02 23:02                     ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-03  4:43                     ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-03  7:58                       ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-03 11:50                         ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-03 23:49                           ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-07 12:35                             ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-04  0:37                           ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-07 12:26                             ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-08  1:12                               ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-07 13:12                             ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-07 16:41                               ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-08  1:25                               ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-08 13:26                                 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-09  0:44                                   ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-09  0:47                                     ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-09  0:47                                     ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-03  4:55                     ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02 23:00                   ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02 12:14               ` chris at martin.cc [this message]
2011-03-02 13:12                 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-02 23:12                   ` Jonas Gorski
2011-03-03  3:40                   ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-03  7:55                     ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-03 15:52                       ` Larry Finger
2011-03-03  5:34                   ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-03  4:23                 ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-02 10:08             ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-03-02 12:17               ` chris at martin.cc
2011-03-03  3:44                 ` chris at martin.cc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTim4XtL9+2mw7Kx_Cu_LXak8Y6a_CgkwtrUHf_bo@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=chris@martin.cc \
    --cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).