From: Fabrizio Regalli <fabreg@gmail.com>
To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Problem with b43
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:40:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin4cgLO3SECq11yi1r_w9LLA6xbEip00Ma96uvx@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C211319.3080601@lwfinger.net>
Now I switched to WEP auth, for trying:
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"XXXX"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.437 GHz Access Point:
00:18:4D:2E:85:4A
Bit Rate=5.5 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
Encryption key:XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX
Power Management:off
Link Quality=70/70 Signal level=-23 dBm
Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0
The wlan0 interface is up & running:
ifconfig wlan0 |grep inet
inet addr:192.168.0.100 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::21d:60ff:fee7:53b8/64 Scope:Link
but nothing to do: it does not ping the ap (192.168.0.2)
PING 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
--- 192.168.0.2 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2016ms
Here's a dmesg output:
[ 160.482533] b43-phy1: Broadcom 4318 WLAN found (core revision 9)
[ 160.524036] b43-phy1 debug: Found PHY: Analog 3, Type 2, Revision 7
[ 160.524058] b43-phy1 debug: Found Radio: Manuf 0x17F, Version 0x2050,
Revision 8
[ 160.548601] phy1: Selected rate control algorithm 'minstrel'
[ 160.549717] Registered led device: b43-phy1::tx
[ 160.549746] Registered led device: b43-phy1::rx
[ 160.549778] Registered led device: b43-phy1::assoc
[ 160.549799] Registered led device: b43-phy1::radio
[ 160.549911] Broadcom 43xx driver loaded [ Features: PL, Firmware-ID: FW13
]
[ 181.508303] b43 ssb0:0: firmware: requesting b43/ucode5.fw
[ 181.510885] b43 ssb0:0: firmware: requesting b43/pcm5.fw
[ 181.513857] b43 ssb0:0: firmware: requesting b43/b0g0initvals5.fw
[ 181.516679] b43 ssb0:0: firmware: requesting b43/b0g0bsinitvals5.fw
[ 181.632028] b43-phy1: Loading firmware version 410.2160 (2007-05-26
15:32:10)
[ 181.652056] b43-phy1 debug: Chip initialized
[ 181.652203] b43-phy1 debug: 32-bit DMA initialized
[ 181.652211] b43-phy1 debug: QoS disabled
[ 181.672368] b43-phy1 debug: Wireless interface started
[ 181.704094] b43-phy1 debug: Adding Interface type 2
[ 181.734463] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
[ 181.916349] wlan0: authenticate with 00:18:4d:2e:85:4a (try 1)
[ 181.917759] wlan0: 00:18:4d:2e:85:4a denied authentication (status 13)
[ 181.918140] wlan0: authenticate with 00:18:4d:2e:85:4a (try 1)
[ 181.923714] wlan0: authenticated
[ 181.924100] wlan0: associate with 00:18:4d:2e:85:4a (try 1)
[ 181.925832] wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:18:4d:2e:85:4a (capab=0x411
status=0 aid=1)
[ 181.925834] wlan0: associated
[ 181.926327] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
[ 191.932006] wlan0: no IPv6 routers present
I'm using a netgear WG602 v3 as access point with 1.2.5 firmware.
Now I'm trying to upgrade AP firmware with WRT
2010/6/22 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> On 06/22/2010 01:54 PM, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
> > G?bor, Larry
> >
> > first of all, excuse me for my mistake: I forget to add in Cc: the ml.
> >
> > The actual situation is:
> >
> > ## /etc/modprobe.d/b43.conf ##
> >
> > options b43 pio=0 qos=0 nohwcrypt=1
> >
> > I remove network-manager and gnome-network-manager
>
> That step was not necessary. I run under the KDE NetworkManager all the
> time.
>
> > It seems to recognize correctly the access point:
> >
> > ## iwconfig ##
> >
> > wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"XXXXX"
> > Mode:Managed Frequency:2.472 GHz Access Point:
> > 00:18:4D:2E:85:4A
> > Bit Rate=1 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> > Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
> > Encryption key:off
> > Power Management:off
> > Link Quality=70/70 Signal level=-21 dBm
> > Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
> > Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0
>
> Yes, you are associated.
>
> >
> > ## ifconfig ##
> >
> > wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1d:60:e7:53:b8
> > inet addr:192.168.0.100 Bcast:192.168.0.255
> Mask:255.255.255.0
> > inet6 addr: fe80::21d:60ff:fee7:53b8/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:49 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:91 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> > RX bytes:4471 (4.3 KiB) TX bytes:12226 (11.9 KiB)
>
> You also have an IP number. Some systems have trouble with IPv6. If you do
> not need it, you might disable it.
>
> > but the ping is very horrible and the connection is unstable:
> >
> >
> > ING 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2 <http://192.168.0.2>: icmp_req=1 ttl=64
> > time=2180 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2 <http://192.168.0.2>: icmp_req=3 ttl=64
> > time=888 ms
> >
> > 24 packets transmitted, 13 received, 45% packet loss, time 23128ms
> > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 215.307/2399.514/5875.790/1923.942 ms, pipe 6
>
> Yes - awful performance.
>
> >
> > ..
> >
> > I'm using wpa_supplicant with wpa2 authentication Could be this the
> > problem?
>
> No. I use WPA2 authentication all the time.
>
> I have no idea what is causing the changes in performance. I do not see
> them. My system will go off-line once in a while, but I never see the
> dropouts or the very long ping times.
>
> Larry
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/b43-dev/attachments/20100622/baa5d1c7/attachment.html>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-22 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-31 21:45 Problem with b43 Fabrizio Regalli
2010-06-01 2:17 ` William Bourque
2010-06-01 8:39 ` Martino Salvetti
2010-06-20 12:04 ` Fabrizio Regalli
2010-06-20 18:12 ` Gábor Stefanik
[not found] ` <AANLkTimpDoxIjIBVOPug5uLADaV5oX6RX8se9VC1x6Pd@mail.gmail.com>
2010-06-21 23:22 ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-06-22 15:09 ` Larry Finger
2010-06-22 18:54 ` Fabrizio Regalli
2010-06-22 19:46 ` Larry Finger
2010-06-22 20:40 ` Fabrizio Regalli [this message]
2010-06-24 21:50 ` Fabrizio Regalli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-24 16:55 problem " Cyrille
2010-09-24 17:06 ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-09-24 17:21 ` John W. Linville
2010-09-24 17:30 ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-09-24 17:43 ` Michael Büsch
2010-09-24 17:39 ` Cyrille
2010-09-24 17:10 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <20100924191547.59c58e7b.cyrille@cbiot.fr>
2010-09-24 17:28 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-09-24 17:32 ` Cyrille
2010-09-24 17:46 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-09-24 18:32 ` Cyrille
2010-09-24 18:39 ` Peter Stuge
2010-09-24 19:28 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTin4cgLO3SECq11yi1r_w9LLA6xbEip00Ma96uvx@mail.gmail.com \
--to=fabreg@gmail.com \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).