From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:14:34 +0200
Subject: Faulty 14e4:4315 (BCM4312)?
In-Reply-To: <4DF00043.1070304@lwfinger.net>
References: <BANLkTin+sAHnQ3afDJH0KMSZEeUqzRDmYw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=RQe_jGFPEOYumPxxxmWM4M+BLcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikg5YSj=9Y+Bbv_8oJSG1OkG4GQBw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=tSGzu57+-MovR2q0y2qLGZ=AwFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTincRK-fo+=dHoDQppsLwfMGmeiWJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=ezOxXVswSNsRqL06A6rozMiaNzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DF00043.1070304@lwfinger.net>
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=VDh7mECOvnCJRfoEDt6WBw2ZtjA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <b43-dev.lists.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org

W dniu 9 czerwca 2011 01:05 u?ytkownik Larry Finger
<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> napisa?:
> On 06/08/2011 05:55 PM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 8 czerwca 2011 23:19 u?ytkownik Rafa? Mi?ecki<zajec5@gmail.com>
>> ?napisa?:
>>>
>>> Forcing rate to 1M workarounded this issue.
>>
>> Working state seems to be random and not related to rate.
>>
>> Even if I manage to connect, I do not have a chance to achieve 1MB/s.
>>
>> At least ndiswrapper seems to work fine. I got easy&stable connection
>> and speed around 10MB/s. Nice to know my card is not faulty.
>
> What is the nature of that 4315 card? Mine is currently in use and has been
> working correctly. This is one of the original PCIe units with the SPROM at
> 0x1000.
>
> When I use the one in the netbook with the SPROM at 0x0800, the unit is a
> lot less stable.

14e4:4315
Mini PCIe
MMIO 16K
BCM94312HMG / DW1397
SSB 2.6
BCM4312
SPROM 8 (0x1000)
PMU 1
PHY LP / 1
RADIO 0x2062 / 2

-- 
Rafa?