From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 18:21:47 +0200 Subject: ChipCommon as independent driver? In-Reply-To: <1301674530.5219.25.camel@maggie> References: <1301673646.5219.18.camel@maggie> <1301674530.5219.25.camel@maggie> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_B=C3=BCsch?= Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev W dniu 1 kwietnia 2011 18:15 u?ytkownik Michael B?sch napisa?: > On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 18:06 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: >> W dniu 1 kwietnia 2011 18:00 u?ytkownik Michael B?sch napisa?: >> > On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 16:49 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: >> >> Do you have idea how we could nicely solve that issue? >> > >> > Yeah. Just don't share code between ssb and bcmai. >> > That's the only clean solution to that mess. >> >> Do you want to have core drivers separated as well? Really? Should we >> have separated pci core? chiccommon core? > > Yes. Those "drivers" are a mess full of ssb specific workarounds > to hardware limitations. I really don't understand what you meant in: 2011/2/18 Michael B?sch : > Note that this does not mean that we need to duplicate the MIPS, > common and probably pci core drivers. A hybrid module can be done, > if that's desired to avoid code duplication. then :| -- Rafa?