From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Faulty 14e4:4315 (BCM4312)?
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 23:19:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTincRK-fo+=dHoDQppsLwfMGmeiWJA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=tSGzu57+-MovR2q0y2qLGZ=AwFA@mail.gmail.com>
W dniu 8 czerwca 2011 23:08 u?ytkownik G?bor Stefanik
<netrolller.3d@gmail.com> napisa?:
> 2011/6/8 Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>:
>> W dniu 8 czerwca 2011 22:37 u?ytkownik G?bor Stefanik
>> <netrolller.3d@gmail.com> napisa?:
>>> 2011/6/8 Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>:
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> I've just discovered I can not connect with my 14e4:4315 to my home network.
>>>>
>>>> dmesg:
>>>> [ ?119.744050] b43-phy0: Loading firmware version 478.104 (2008-07-01 00:50:23)
>>>> [ ?119.746744] b43-phy0 debug: b2062: Using crystal tab entry 19200 kHz.
>>>> [ ?121.130067] b43-phy0 debug: Chip initialized
>>>> [ ?121.130348] b43-phy0 debug: 64-bit DMA initialized
>>>> [ ?121.130416] b43-phy0 debug: QoS enabled
>>>> [ ?121.139857] b43-phy0 debug: Wireless interface started
>>>> [ ?121.145095] b43-phy0 debug: Adding Interface type 2
>>>> [ ?121.145605] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
>>>> [ ?128.295371] wlan0: authenticate with 00:23:69:c2:65:06 (try 1)
>>>> [ ?128.300285] wlan0: authenticated
>>>> [ ?128.300319] wlan0: associate with 00:23:69:c2:65:06 (try 1)
>>>> [ ?128.303709] wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:23:69:c2:65:06 (capab=0x411
>>>> status=0 aid=3)
>>>> [ ?128.303715] wlan0: associated
>>>> [ ?128.304711] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
>>>> [ ?128.429557] b43-phy0 debug: Using hardware based encryption for
>>>> keyidx: 0, mac: 00:23:69:c2:65:06
>>>> [ ?128.429611] b43-phy0 debug: Using hardware based encryption for
>>>> keyidx: 2, mac: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>>> [ ?132.208036] ieee80211 phy0: wlan0: No probe response from AP
>>>> 00:23:69:c2:65:06 after 500ms, disconnecting.
>>>>
>>>> wpa_supplicant fills my console with:
>>>>> ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Invalid argument
>>>>> ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Invalid argument
>>>>> Trying to associate with 00:23:69:c2:65:06 (SSID='zajec_poznan_160' freq=2427 MHz)
>>>>> Associated with 00:23:69:c2:65:06
>>>>> WPA: Key negotiation completed with 00:23:69:c2:65:06 [PTK=CCMP GTK=CCMP]
>>>>> CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED - Connection to 00:23:69:c2:65:06 completed (auth) [id=0 id_str=]
>>>>> CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:23:69:c2:65:06 reason=0
>>>>
>>>> It seems it was already reported, for example in:
>>>> "No probe response from AP <address> after 500ms, disconnecting." by
>>>> Miklos Vajna on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:29:20 -0800.
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/bcm43xx-dev at lists.berlios.de/msg09481.html
>>>>
>>>> What's really surprising I can not connect to this network also when
>>>> using wl 5.100.82.38!
>>>>
>>>> Did anyone of you already got some faulty BCM4312 hardware? Did it
>>>> behave like this? I'm surprised than scanning works, but connection is
>>>> quickly dropped. It does not really sound like a faulty hardware.
>>>
>>> Chances are, your card can happily communicate with the AP using CCK,
>>> but once it tries to do OFDM, it fails.
>>> Is the AP close enough for OFDM communication?
>>
>> My AP is about 2 meters from the card, antennas are attached OFC.
>>
>> --
>> Rafa?
>>
>
> You are too close to the AP then - the AP's signal is jamming the
> card's receiver (or vice versa). Again, CCK is more resilient in this
> aspect than OFDM, hence no problems until association.
I believe that even if one is jamming the other, connection should
still work. I can accept lower performance, packet loss, but not
disconnection at all.
Actually after receiving tip about OFDM from you, I went back to the
machine and checked for the news. It was running wpa_supplicant for
all this time. I'm glad to say dmesg said the same thing you did. TX
transmission errors :) The old known friend from N-PHY cards.
Forcing rate to 1M workarounded this issue.
--
Rafa?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-08 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-08 20:25 Faulty 14e4:4315 (BCM4312)? Rafał Miłecki
2011-06-08 20:37 ` Gábor Stefanik
2011-06-08 20:59 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-06-08 20:59 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-06-08 21:08 ` Gábor Stefanik
2011-06-08 21:19 ` Rafał Miłecki [this message]
2011-06-08 22:55 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-06-08 23:05 ` Larry Finger
2011-06-08 23:14 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-06-08 23:30 ` Larry Finger
2011-06-08 23:47 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-06-09 0:27 ` Larry Finger
2011-06-11 7:53 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-06-11 16:20 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-06-11 17:36 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-06-12 20:46 ` Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTincRK-fo+=dHoDQppsLwfMGmeiWJA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=zajec5@gmail.com \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).