From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:50296 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751362AbaJaHmI (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:42:08 -0400 Message-ID: <1414741319.3014.4.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20141031_084210_446659_9CED1155) Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/4] backports: replace BACKPORT_PWD with BACKPORT_DIR From: Johannes Berg To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: backports@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yann.morin.1998@free.fr, mmarek@suse.cz, sassmann@kpanic.de, "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:41:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1414570902-5675-3-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> (sfid-20141029_092415_159248_4CCB658A) References: <1414570902-5675-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1414570902-5675-3-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> (sfid-20141029_092415_159248_4CCB658A) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 01:21 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" > > This will also be used for built-in kernel integration, by > using this we can share more code with the built-in kernel > approach. I see no issues with this, looks like a straight rename. johannes