Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] backports: use BACKPORT_DIR prefix on kconfig sources

Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-11-05T22:22:47Z

On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 10:19:14PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 21:11 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > This does mean that bp_prefix topic *can* also be tied down
> > with this other directory prefix as a form of 'builder' for
> > integration. Making the prefix configurable would make sense
> > then only if also making the directory prefix should be
> > configurable.
>
> Indeed.
>
> > I think we're better off right now with just supporting two
> > approaches with their own directory prefix, and prefixes
> > for variables.
>
> Sure, that's fine. I have no issues with either, but I'd like to see the
> two cases actually combined and separated, in the sense that you don't
> have magic code that tries both and just succeeds on one, but only have
> code that tries the right thing.

Fair enough.

Luis