Linux backports project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
To: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	backports@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: deprecating more kernel versions
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 06:20:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1486441223.3070.2.camel@coelho.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04ef169d-49b1-98e0-1db6-7c4e7e9b5c9f@broadcom.com>

On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:45 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 6-2-2017 17:37, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > What kernel versions do you still need?
> > 
> > For example, 3.0 is getting really quite old, the oldest long-term
> > stable is 3.2.x now.
> 
> We currently backport internal tree and wireless-testing nightly to 3.10
> and 3.11 kernels.

I think capping at 3.10 is reasonable.  Internally, we have been
supporting 3.8+, but we got permission to support only 3.12 and above.

Last time we nuked support for older kernels [1], we were supporting
only 15 kernel versions (3.0 through 3.14).  Now we are at 30 (3.0
through 4.10 -- sort of).  If we make the cut at 3.10 we are at 20,
which is still a lot more conservative than our last "nuke".

[1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/backports/backports.git/commit/?id=be4a0f9ad7e17670d7a30c9e94d5dd918425f90a

--
Cheers,
Luca.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-07  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-06 16:37 deprecating more kernel versions Johannes Berg
2017-02-06 22:45 ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-02-07  4:20   ` Luca Coelho [this message]
2017-02-07  4:48     ` Steve deRosier
2017-02-07  6:38       ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1486441223.3070.2.camel@coelho.fi \
    --to=luca@coelho.fi \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=backports@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox