From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:60846 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750905AbdIEJAU (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2017 05:00:20 -0400 Message-ID: <1504602018.12380.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20170905_110022_670993_0F1633D4) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] backports: multiple changes for kernel 3.13-rc6 From: Johannes Berg To: Hauke Mehrtens Cc: backports@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:00:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170821222817.17376-1-hauke@hauke-m.de> (sfid-20170822_002853_183210_AA20A23A) References: <20170821222817.17376-1-hauke@hauke-m.de> (sfid-20170822_002853_183210_AA20A23A) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Hauke, > This was build tested with kernel 3.18, 4.4 and 4.9. and runtime > tested with iwlwifi on kernel 4.9. Cool. > Are you planing to to releases in a tar? Not personally, no. I barely have time to do any maintenance here to start with, and still haven't set up any infrastructure to allow others to really help out significantly. > Which kernel versions are currently support by backports? I think we didn't really change anything, so should be 3.0+ > patches/0079-netdev-destructor.cocci takes very long to apply, about > 3 times longer all others together. I doubt we can do anything about that. > Should we remove ssb and bcma from backports and use the in kernel  > versions instead? I do not expect so many changes any more affecting > the wifi drivers. I have no opinion either way. > Is the compat wireless build server still being used? It's still *there*, but I haven't really used it in a long time. I was planning to set up some kind of auto-builder but haven't gotten around to it. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in