From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:48156 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751817AbdIFHXp (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2017 03:23:45 -0400 Message-ID: <1504682623.12380.25.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20170906_092347_052170_C8DFE816) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] backports: multiple changes for kernel 3.13-rc6 From: Johannes Berg To: Hauke Mehrtens Cc: backports@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 09:23:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20170821222817.17376-1-hauke@hauke-m.de> <1504602018.12380.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 23:41 +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > I would prefer to drop everything < 3.10, or do not care about older > kernel versions. For LEDE I am only interested in 3.18 or 4.4 and > more recent. I think internally we still might care about some older versions, not sure though. There's also still a 3.2 and 3.4 LTS kernel on kernel.org, with the former (3.2) having been updated just a week ago or so. Perhaps we should phase out older non-LTS kernels, but how much effort would that be, and how much effort is going into those older kernels anyway? > How do we want to proceed with these patches? I just got back from sabbatical, but once I have some more time I'll go ahead and review/apply them, and hopefully also start working on some auto-building infrastructure. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in