From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:57007 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752192AbaDKGPO (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2014 02:15:14 -0400 Message-ID: <5347886F.8070307@users.sourceforge.net> (sfid-20140411_081537_194367_B754D06D) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 08:15:11 +0200 From: SF Markus Elfring MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julia Lawall CC: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Johannes Berg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, backports@vger.kernel.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: add pycocci wrapper for multithreaded support References: <1397152097-315-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1397152289.4757.28.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20140410175748.GK14815@wotan.suse.de> <534783DB.4080200@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> Could you find out during the data processing which parts or files >> result in a special application behaviour you would like to point out here? > I don't understand the question at all, but since the various files have > different properties, it is hard to determine automatically in advance how > much work Coccinelle will need to do on each one. It was reported that a system utilisation did not fit to some expectations. I am curious if any more details or patterns can be determined for an observed situation. Do the involved files need also another look? - semantic patches - source directories Regards, Markus