From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Message-ID: <5451FA02.4060703@trego.co.il> (sfid-20141030_094246_401438_4477F2E5) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:42:42 +0200 From: Eyal Ben-Sasson MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg CC: backports@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: build backports-20140905 against 2.6.39 kernel failure References: <5451179D.6020009@trego.co.il> (sfid-20141029_173700_652943_FC9D8B2D) <1414604671.1827.30.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1414604671.1827.30.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010009040309000008070106" List-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010009040309000008070106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OK. Now I see it. I will go back to backports-3.14 and try it. Thanx. Eyal On 10/29/2014 07:44 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 18:36 +0200, Eyal Ben-Sasson wrote: > >> I understand the backports is tested against 2.6.39 successfully. Where >> can I see the 2.6.39 .config file? > This is no longer the case, the oldest supported kernel is now 3.0. > > johannes > > --------------010009040309000008070106 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
OK. Now I see it. I will go back to backports-3.14 and try it.
Thanx.

Eyal

On 10/29/2014 07:44 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 18:36 +0200, Eyal Ben-Sasson wrote:


I understand the backports is tested against 2.6.39 successfully. Where 
can I see the 2.6.39 .config file?

This is no longer the case, the oldest supported kernel is now 3.0.

johannes

--------------010009040309000008070106--