From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>,
backports@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CodingStyle: add some more error handling guidelines
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:00:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <547F33AC.50002@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547F1942.5060502@broadcom.com>
>> Which name pattern do you find more appropriate in such
>> an use case?
>
> I think Dan wants the label to be descriptive about the tasks
> needed in the exception handling itself.
I would usually prefer also such a target-oriented labelling
for the affected identifiers.
How are the chances to express an expectation in this direction
unambiguously for the proposed coding style update?
> This makes sense as the exception handling steps may be reused
> for different failures in the code.
I would stress a different reason from my point of view.
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-03 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20141202085950.GA13434@mwanda>
2014-12-03 12:31 ` [patch] CodingStyle: add some more error handling guidelines SF Markus Elfring
2014-12-03 12:39 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-03 12:51 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-12-03 12:45 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-12-03 12:52 ` Julia Lawall
2014-12-03 13:15 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-12-03 13:00 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-12-03 13:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-12-03 13:24 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-12-03 14:08 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-03 16:00 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2014-12-03 19:13 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-03 23:11 ` SF Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=547F33AC.50002@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=backports@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox