From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from diktynna.open-mesh.org (diktynna.open-mesh.org [136.243.236.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A7B0C54E60 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from diktynna.open-mesh.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by diktynna.open-mesh.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2A281AE8 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:46:37 +0100 (CET) ARC-Seal: i=2; cv=pass; a=rsa-sha256; d=open-mesh.org; s=20121; t=1710845197; b=r5eGVzrAU/IBHMf/pXQ7IMs+M66sZl5ammLQ5qkQ0mYtcB42Q8U4gjCCPbByY2aqI9Z0m 76ceT4qtk2XMPWbqJcaGSeCf9Hq3Z3WvIk6b71k2Ze9L+EVukhsxI/FeWb38Xfh2E3G2Dbx OO2Q17IMSCjD3WCfRzQeAp0OjeZFf8s= ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=open-mesh.org; s=20121; t=1710845197; h=from : sender : reply-to : subject : date : message-id : to : cc : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : content-id : content-description : resent-date : resent-from : resent-sender : resent-to : resent-cc : resent-message-id : in-reply-to : references : list-id : list-help : list-unsubscribe : list-subscribe : list-post : list-owner : list-archive; bh=AfH616evJHoxgc9RlKueSdsKtzrhRnXKCq+xBkHhWYc=; b=CY+cjGAQ37PUXw2dZUXI0MCKFwpb/sHTFn/edamiot1nFIMUor/lBlbdE6YBmBZ2MUyZj VyhA403FE/yTB64zTYH6ttDgN9F74gwMgBr29EDJrVFtUKHKSgNtlXkJVFrJ1LeZuorWpcT YJRtTqRuUvrAYGb4yW9M/Gt9vr+KRA0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; open-mesh.org; dkim=fail; arc=pass; dmarc=fail (Used Org Domain Record) header.from=syzkaller.appspotmail.com policy.dmarc=none Authentication-Results: open-mesh.org; dkim=fail; arc=pass; dmarc=fail (Used Org Domain Record) header.from=syzkaller.appspotmail.com policy.dmarc=none Received: from mail-io1-f70.google.com (mail-io1-f70.google.com [209.85.166.70]) by diktynna.open-mesh.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89C1B80B7A for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:33:18 +0100 (CET) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=open-mesh.org; s=20121; t=1710844398; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=AfH616evJHoxgc9RlKueSdsKtzrhRnXKCq+xBkHhWYc=; b=WvohFKIvn/KoxI+hn3xVqoEwji/QKt331v218Rd52Y02pu7UuGslSRZbZKXQwNeL++xeb2 zeQmNi0921suGWr67YC2KSZd2ffVZcyOphbPFLK40CbwwsccowXG3HsBVIRa11iZR/h7Xm 9qi89zTNpFoH4DexfOz66Oi9ohUAbeI= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=20121; d=open-mesh.org; t=1710844398; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=3dUY4yqlFMuvHhlyv3aAI78B7KTxWGQS3oDFF7dhS+GCFKcXst+ItwRsnZrorTlCThw/zL 7x0oCbsoczOaQqVpJuUDwHUOaq/DgNxytekWQFi+7j/TwgUI+J7nPz6nesLetQRR0R3Cg+ JTN6PZ53ClS03IzjqLi0WsuOC45FoyM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; diktynna.open-mesh.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=appspotmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (diktynna.open-mesh.org: domain of 37Wn5ZQkbANwQWXI8JJCP8NNGB.EMMEJCSQCPAMLRCLR.AMK@M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com designates 209.85.166.70 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=37Wn5ZQkbANwQWXI8JJCP8NNGB.EMMEJCSQCPAMLRCLR.AMK@M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com Received: by mail-io1-f70.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7cc74ea9c20so188307439f.1 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 03:33:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710844397; x=1711449197; h=to:from:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:date:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AfH616evJHoxgc9RlKueSdsKtzrhRnXKCq+xBkHhWYc=; b=TZoDTDHkkH0NF3uuL07ID/9ccqXTmkyJNJUcEYIil2Mb4nEG6A3YzXK75w0iXmTvSo WwTj+7+CJw+VbxvgM7yigCBUB2Jc4tAOsveJ0eefetD1qexX+whaaVjhOH0vfvuTyZU2 nt9kDv6iRo4gSkwtbQGp+V/GnOThB4jw/X3muIs9M6moiZSPUCVvG41HLJbl4BaeTeQn wXH4jPm+ctw2V8IIIwGrZNjcXUdSsDGulRGgRByIIwzoWdFPpXfmWw96ydCJuDbvVPu3 c5Z5YyJ+NFZg8k1b4l2jHXaj5CrzGGAiZjhKeRZ+keVNNI7czVNNl9qkUkYjto/1b/zQ 7AXw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU16/sPbYM0IH9Mqiwaw5l11oDpt6450cpKRdSg9LaVw8Wir6kFvEkhWmWiS173Y7rukHpmDn4LGH/PcU7LQN/78dYXlF7ZM4l89RdOSzz1 X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwAaw7rsXxm6C5NPp7eJxpnVNqFfgvmOpFFfnk6Ro2x3T381pVU 2vXZROK963uGsnpCFYd/+355c8JRxifnbGbddTkfAWFoipsJFCeyc9HBkOHPvF8QSejg2Uv2lh1 9Lvgj1AbEcP0d7OA8hm5YTuXwQy4mxRUPRYTlPPZuJsExY/Vv9Z1l4ck= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEQ+82wEpKYZLgs0UzhGbaG/fopGadQHCSj12KG9g2jPIb2Kpj1qbNa3YUd/izEr61RA3aDY1mqpqSytY3Ow+SuKPX2jPrG MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:641f:b0:7cc:4c0:65c5 with SMTP id gn31-20020a056602641f00b007cc04c065c5mr175800iob.1.1710844397224; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 03:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 03:33:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <000000000000c0645805b7f982e4@google.com> X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~syzkaller X-Google-Appengine-App-Id-Alias: syzkaller Message-ID: <000000000000901b1c0614010091@google.com> Subject: Re: [syzbot] [batman?] [bpf?] possible deadlock in lock_timer_base From: syzbot To: a@unstable.cc, akpm@linux-foundation.org, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, christian@brauner.io, daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net, dvyukov@google.com, edumazet@google.com, elver@google.com, glider@google.com, hdanton@sina.com, jakub@cloudflare.com, jannh@google.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mareklindner@neomailbox.ch, mark.rutland@arm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, shakeelb@google.com, sven@narfation.org, sw@simonwunderlich.de, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-MailFrom: 37Wn5ZQkbANwQWXI8JJCP8NNGB.EMMEJCSQCPAMLRCLR.AMK@M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: max-recipients X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.org-0; header-match-b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.org-1; header-match-b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.org-2; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header Message-ID-Hash: W7ORKBVSNHQQCS4UDVJ5SLHQMDXTI5YQ X-Message-ID-Hash: W7ORKBVSNHQQCS4UDVJ5SLHQMDXTI5YQ X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:46:19 +0100 X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8 Precedence: list List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on: HEAD commit: 35c3e2791756 Revert "net: Re-use and set mono_delivery_tim.. git tree: net console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10569181180000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=6fb1be60a193d440 dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8983d6d4f7df556be565 compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40 syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=13d9fa4e180000 C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=137afac9180000 Downloadable assets: disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/26b55a26fc12/disk-35c3e279.raw.xz vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6f39fa55c828/vmlinux-35c3e279.xz kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e1e0501539e6/bzImage-35c3e279.xz IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+8983d6d4f7df556be565@syzkaller.appspotmail.com ===================================================== WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.8.0-syzkaller-05228-g35c3e2791756 #0 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- rcu_preempt/16 [HC0[0]:SC0[2]:HE0:SE0] is trying to acquire: ffff888021c65020 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffff888021c65020 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939 and this task is already holding: ffff8880b952a758 (&base->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: lock_timer_base+0x112/0x240 kernel/time/timer.c:1051 which would create a new lock dependency: (&base->lock){-.-.}-{2:2} -> ( &htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2} but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&base->lock){-.-.}-{2:2} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at: lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 lock_timer_base+0x112/0x240 kernel/time/timer.c:1051 add_timer_on+0x1e5/0x5c0 kernel/time/timer.c:1366 handle_irq_event_percpu kernel/irq/handle.c:195 [inline] handle_irq_event+0xad/0x1f0 kernel/irq/handle.c:210 handle_level_irq+0x3c5/0x6e0 kernel/irq/chip.c:648 generic_handle_irq_desc include/linux/irqdesc.h:161 [inline] handle_irq arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:238 [inline] __common_interrupt+0x13a/0x230 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:257 common_interrupt+0xa5/0xd0 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247 asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:693 __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:152 [inline] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xd8/0x140 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:194 __setup_irq+0x1277/0x1cf0 kernel/irq/manage.c:1818 request_threaded_irq+0x2ab/0x380 kernel/irq/manage.c:2202 request_irq include/linux/interrupt.h:168 [inline] setup_default_timer_irq+0x25/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/time.c:70 x86_late_time_init+0x66/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/time.c:94 start_kernel+0x3f3/0x500 init/main.c:1039 x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x30 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:509 x86_64_start_kernel+0x99/0xa0 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:490 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x147 to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ... lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] sock_hash_free+0x164/0x820 net/core/sock_map.c:1154 bpf_map_free_deferred+0xe6/0x110 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:734 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa00/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243 other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock ); local_irq_disable(); lock(&base->lock); lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock ); lock(&base->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by rcu_preempt/16: #0: ffff8880b952a758 (&base->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: lock_timer_base+0x112/0x240 kernel/time/timer.c:1051 #1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock ){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:298 [inline] ){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:750 [inline] ){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2380 [inline] ){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0x114/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420 the dependencies between HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock: -> (&base->lock){-.-.}-{2:2} { IN-HARDIRQ-W at: lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 lock_timer_base+0x112/0x240 kernel/time/timer.c:1051 add_timer_on+0x1e5/0x5c0 kernel/time/timer.c:1366 handle_irq_event_percpu kernel/irq/handle.c:195 [inline] handle_irq_event+0xad/0x1f0 kernel/irq/handle.c:210 handle_level_irq+0x3c5/0x6e0 kernel/irq/chip.c:648 generic_handle_irq_desc include/linux/irqdesc.h:161 [inline] handle_irq arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:238 [inline] __common_interrupt+0x13a/0x230 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:257 common_interrupt+0xa5/0xd0 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247 asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:693 __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:152 [inline] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xd8/0x140 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:194 __setup_irq+0x1277/0x1cf0 kernel/irq/manage.c:1818 request_threaded_irq+0x2ab/0x380 kernel/irq/manage.c:2202 request_irq include/linux/interrupt.h:168 [inline] setup_default_timer_irq+0x25/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/time.c:70 x86_late_time_init+0x66/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/time.c:94 start_kernel+0x3f3/0x500 init/main.c:1039 x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x30 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:509 x86_64_start_kernel+0x99/0xa0 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:490 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x147 IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xd3/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170 __run_timer_base+0x103/0x8e0 kernel/time/timer.c:2418 run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2428 [inline] run_timer_softirq+0x67/0x170 kernel/time/timer.c:2436 __do_softirq+0x2be/0x943 kernel/softirq.c:554 invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:428 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0xf2/0x1c0 kernel/softirq.c:633 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:645 common_interrupt+0xaa/0xd0 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247 asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:693 console_flush_all+0x9cd/0xec0 console_unlock+0x13b/0x4d0 kernel/printk/printk.c:3025 vprintk_emit+0x509/0x720 kernel/printk/printk.c:2292 _printk+0xd5/0x120 kernel/printk/printk.c:2317 cpu_select_mitigations+0x3c/0xa0 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c:148 arch_cpu_finalize_init+0x20/0xa0 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:2325 start_kernel+0x402/0x500 init/main.c:1043 x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x30 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:509 x86_64_start_kernel+0x99/0xa0 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:490 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x147 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 lock_timer_base+0x112/0x240 kernel/time/timer.c:1051 __mod_timer+0x1ca/0xeb0 kernel/time/timer.c:1132 queue_delayed_work_on+0x15a/0x260 kernel/workqueue.c:2595 queue_delayed_work include/linux/workqueue.h:620 [inline] crng_reseed+0xe7/0x220 drivers/char/random.c:258 random_init+0x1a9/0x300 drivers/char/random.c:901 start_kernel+0x253/0x500 init/main.c:991 x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x30 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:509 x86_64_start_kernel+0x99/0xa0 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:490 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x147 } ... key at: [] init_timer_cpu.__key+0x0/0x20 the dependencies between the lock to be acquired and HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: -> (&htab->buckets[i].lock ){+...}-{2:2} { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] sock_hash_free+0x164/0x820 net/core/sock_map.c:1154 bpf_map_free_deferred+0xe6/0x110 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:734 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa00/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] sock_hash_free+0x164/0x820 net/core/sock_map.c:1154 bpf_map_free_deferred+0xe6/0x110 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:734 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa00/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243 } ... key at: [] sock_hash_alloc.__key+0x0/0x20 ... acquired at: lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939 bpf_prog_2c29ac5cdc6b1842+0x42/0x46 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline] __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline] __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline] bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420 trace_timer_start include/trace/events/timer.h:52 [inline] enqueue_timer+0x396/0x550 kernel/time/timer.c:663 internal_add_timer kernel/time/timer.c:688 [inline] __mod_timer+0xa0e/0xeb0 kernel/time/timer.c:1183 schedule_timeout+0x1b9/0x310 kernel/time/timer.c:2571 rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x2df/0x1370 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1663 rcu_gp_kthread+0xa7/0x3b0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1862 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 16 Comm: rcu_preempt Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05228-g35c3e2791756 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2e0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_bad_irq_dependency kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2626 [inline] check_irq_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2865 [inline] check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3138 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x4dc7/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939 bpf_prog_2c29ac5cdc6b1842+0x42/0x46 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline] __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline] __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline] bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420 trace_timer_start include/trace/events/timer.h:52 [inline] enqueue_timer+0x396/0x550 kernel/time/timer.c:663 internal_add_timer kernel/time/timer.c:688 [inline] __mod_timer+0xa0e/0xeb0 kernel/time/timer.c:1183 schedule_timeout+0x1b9/0x310 kernel/time/timer.c:2571 rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x2df/0x1370 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1663 rcu_gp_kthread+0xa7/0x3b0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1862 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243 --- If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with: #syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.