public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Check skb size before using encapsulated ETH+VLAN header
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:49:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10633463.PgZ4eD0ZeI@voltaire> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456505773-1059-1-git-send-email-sven@narfation.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1214 bytes --]

On Friday, February 26, 2016 17:56:13 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> --- a/net/batman-adv/soft-interface.c
> +++ b/net/batman-adv/soft-interface.c
> @@ -408,11 +408,17 @@ void batadv_interface_rx(struct net_device
> *soft_iface, */
>  	nf_reset(skb);
> 
> +	if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN)))
> +		goto dropped;
> +
>  	vid = batadv_get_vid(skb, 0);

batadv_get_vid() also calls pskb_may_pull() and checks for VLAN_ETH_HLEN 
length. Isn't that sufficient ?

On a related note - a few lines before your check you'll find:

/* check if enough space is available for pulling, and pull */
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, hdr_size))

In its current form that check is useless because batadv_recv_unicast_packet() 
already calls batadv_check_unicast_packet() which does the same 
pskb_may_pull(skb, hdr_size). Am I overlooking something ?


>  	switch (ntohs(ethhdr->h_proto)) {
>  	case ETH_P_8021Q:
> +		if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
> +			goto dropped;

Shouldn't this memory access be covered by the earlier check inside 
batadv_get_vid() ?


>  	/* skb->dev & skb->pkt_type are set here */
> -	if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN)))
> -		goto dropped;

Agreed that this seems unnecessary.

Cheers,
Marek

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-28  0:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-26 16:56 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Check skb size before using encapsulated ETH+VLAN header Sven Eckelmann
2016-02-28  0:49 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2016-02-28  6:36   ` Sven Eckelmann
2016-02-28  9:02     ` Antonio Quartulli
2016-02-28  9:20       ` Sven Eckelmann
2016-02-28  9:42         ` Antonio Quartulli
2016-03-20  9:57 ` Marek Lindner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10633463.PgZ4eD0ZeI@voltaire \
    --to=mareklindner@neomailbox.ch \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox