From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Bjoern Franke In-Reply-To: <201101311933.01581.clemens-john@gmx.de> References: <201101282346.16035.clemens-john@gmx.de> <1296323152.2725.6.camel@mytilus> <201101291900.51081.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <201101311933.01581.clemens-john@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:12:55 +0100 Message-ID: <1296562375.26635.5.camel@ostrea> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Connecting through Batman advanced interface Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi, > > I don't think the VPN is the problem here but the fact that you can't > > bridge an interface running in adhoc mode. Ad-hoc is "lacks" a field in > > the wifi header which makes bridging impossible. > > However, I agree with your proposed solution - another router connected to > > the Ethernet of the wrt54g can solve the issue. > > This is not possible in this case (I don“t have another router). Does Franco have another router which he could connect to the wrt54g? > Is there onother (maybe harder) way or a hack to do get the same result like > when bridging two interfaces? Maybe with iptables? I think this would break our setup. > Or does anyone know what the status of multiple ssid on wrt54g with kernel 2.6 > is? Maybe we should ask here: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/b43#support I have no experience with brcm-chips due to I have only a brcm4318 in my laptop. regards Bjoern -- jabber: bjo@schafweide.org bjo.nord-west.org | nord-west.org | freifunk-ol.de