[B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 3/3] batman-adv: Only increase refcounter once for alternate router

[Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>]

The test whether we can use a router for alternating bonding should only be
done once because it is already known that it is still usable and will not be
deleted from the list soon.

This patch addresses Coverity #712285: Unchecked return value

Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
---
 routing.c |   23 ++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/routing.c b/routing.c
index 939fc01..cdd81d8 100644
--- a/routing.c
+++ b/routing.c
@@ -549,25 +549,18 @@ batadv_find_ifalter_router(struct batadv_orig_node *primary_orig,
 		if (tmp_neigh_node->if_incoming == recv_if)
 			continue;
 
+		if (router && tmp_neigh_node->tq_avg <= router->tq_avg)
+			continue;
+
 		if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&tmp_neigh_node->refcount))
 			continue;
 
-		/* if we don't have a router yet
-		 * or this one is better, choose it.
-		 */
-		if ((!router) ||
-		    (tmp_neigh_node->tq_avg > router->tq_avg)) {
-			/* decrement refcount of
-			 * previously selected router
-			 */
-			if (router)
-				batadv_neigh_node_free_ref(router);
+		/* decrement refcount of previously selected router */
+		if (router)
+			batadv_neigh_node_free_ref(router);
 
-			router = tmp_neigh_node;
-			atomic_inc_not_zero(&router->refcount);
-		}
-
-		batadv_neigh_node_free_ref(tmp_neigh_node);
+		/* we found a better router (or at least one valid router) */
+		router = tmp_neigh_node;
 	}
 
 	/* use the first candidate if nothing was found. */
-- 
1.7.10.4