public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fuumind <fuumind@openmailbox.org>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] how well does batman-adv scale
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:44:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493376248.28193.6.camel@openmailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504855.vmUtePouqW@prime>

Ok, so clouds of a few hundred nodes would work reasonably well and at
the same time keep customization to a minimum.

What makes OSPF a better candidate for interfacing between the clouds?
Does it keep a more limited routing table and thus minimize overhead
traffic? I haven't been able to figure it out good enough yet.

fuumind

ons 2017-04-26 klockan 18:05 +0200 skrev Simon Wunderlich:
> Hi,
> 
> "works well" depends much on  your scenario.
> 
> I've seen many well-working networks with 100-300 nodes. There are
> Freifunk 
> community networks with over 1000 nodes running batman-adv (i.e.
> "standard" 
> users like laptops and smartphones), but they employ a lot of
> filtering to 
> avoid too much broadcast.
> 
> Unless you have special restrictions like minimal broadcast traffic
> or high 
> capacity on the wireless links, memory and CPU, I would not recommend
> to plan 
> for 10 000 nodes and beyond.
> 
> Cheers,
>      Simon
> 
> On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 4:20:59 PM CEST fuumind wrote:
> > 
> > Hi list!
> > 
> > Been lurking for almost a year on the battlemesh list and recently
> > joined here as well. 
> > 
> > I'm curious about how well batman-adv scales. Would a network of 10
> > 000
> > nodes work well? What about 100 000 nodes or 1 000 000?
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > fuumind

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-28 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-26 14:20 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] how well does batman-adv scale fuumind
2017-04-26 15:10 ` jens
2017-04-26 15:53   ` dan
2017-04-26 16:06   ` fuumind
2017-04-26 16:12     ` dan
2017-04-26 16:05 ` Simon Wunderlich
2017-04-28 10:44   ` fuumind [this message]
2017-04-28 12:23     ` Simon Wunderlich
2017-04-28 14:26       ` fuumind
2017-05-02 11:35       ` Adrian Reyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1493376248.28193.6.camel@openmailbox.org \
    --to=fuumind@openmailbox.org \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox