From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1493376248.28193.6.camel@openmailbox.org> From: fuumind Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:44:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1504855.vmUtePouqW@prime> References: <1493216459.18414.3.camel@openmailbox.org> <1504855.vmUtePouqW@prime> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] how well does batman-adv scale List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org Ok, so clouds of a few hundred nodes would work reasonably well and at the same time keep customization to a minimum. What makes OSPF a better candidate for interfacing between the clouds? Does it keep a more limited routing table and thus minimize overhead traffic? I haven't been able to figure it out good enough yet. fuumind ons 2017-04-26 klockan 18:05 +0200 skrev Simon Wunderlich: > Hi, > > "works well" depends much on  your scenario. > > I've seen many well-working networks with 100-300 nodes. There are > Freifunk  > community networks with over 1000 nodes running batman-adv (i.e. > "standard"  > users like laptops and smartphones), but they employ a lot of > filtering to  > avoid too much broadcast. > > Unless you have special restrictions like minimal broadcast traffic > or high  > capacity on the wireless links, memory and CPU, I would not recommend > to plan  > for 10 000 nodes and beyond. > > Cheers, >      Simon > > On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 4:20:59 PM CEST fuumind wrote: > > > > Hi list! > > > > Been lurking for almost a year on the battlemesh list and recently > > joined here as well.  > > > > I'm curious about how well batman-adv scales. Would a network of 10 > > 000 > > nodes work well? What about 100 000 nodes or 1 000 000? > > > > Thanks! > > fuumind