From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: "Jay Brussels" References: <744721D9-A7D7-4F59-93E2-ED4DA8939D53@altermundi.net> In-Reply-To: <744721D9-A7D7-4F59-93E2-ED4DA8939D53@altermundi.net> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:44:19 -0400 Message-ID: <156a01cfe886$809ba760$81d2f620$@dslx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-us Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] good dual radio node? Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: 'The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking' Have you deployed 100 radios in a single mesh? We are used to doing = frequency allocation/management and with a single radio mesh AP all = radios need to be on the same frequency correct? We are planning on = using dual-radio nodes but the 2.4G will be for the client access and = the 5.8G will be for the mesh. =20 This is a huge project with 6,000 nodes in a one square mile community. -----Original Message----- From: B.A.T.M.A.N [mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-bounces@lists.open-mesh.org] On = Behalf Of Gui Iribarren Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 3:55 AM To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking; dan Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] good dual radio node? Tplink wdr3500, we've deployed more than 100, running nice with = barrierbreaker tplink wdr3600 is identical, but with gigabit ethernet in = some places, one or the other will be easier to find (availability) and = cheaper. Tplink wdr4300 is like wdr3600 but with 3x3 on one of the bands (5ghz = IIRC) so it has an extra, single-band antenna HTH, cheers! On October 14, 2014 7:34:56 PM CDT, dan wrote: >Anyone have any recommendations for a good dual radio mesh node for=20 >batman-adv that won't break the bank? I'm looking at having wired=20 >clients, but two mesh radios to keep throughput high. 802.11n radios=20 >also required. > >Thanks!