From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Recover in case of node fail
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:12:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15974886.03QyElGMEP@bentobox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALaFpeUvicwHWQag0Upv5UNQ935TYY-RJuXVUtpT7gfORWZm7A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1543 bytes --]
On Wednesday 22 July 2015 15:26:23 Carlos Meralto wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to make a study of various protocols for WMN and one of
> them is BATMAN. One the tests is the time to recovery in case of node
> fail.
>
> I have a topology with 4 routers with 2 possible paths:
> A-B-C
> A-D-C
>
> For the test i'm doing a continuous ping from A to C (level 3 ping)
> and shut down the router that forward the message (i.e B or C). In
> this test BATMAN can't recover the PING. But when i cancel the ping
> and check the Originators table (batctl o) the route is refreshed. And
> when i try to ping again it works.
>
> Is any limitation in BATMAN for recovery in a continuous PING?
No, sounds more like you are not using batman-adv. Because
batman-adv doesn't know about the l3 stuff. It just
transfers ethernet frames from A to C. B and D are
chosen automatically for each frame (and not for a
l3/l4/... connection).
A `batctl o` does not trigger any route re-calculation.
You can use batctl ping with -R to see the hops and the
switch of the route when D fails.
Btw. if you have a setup with many dynamic changes then you
may want to reduce the originator interval on each node.
> Has anyone done this type of test and values obtained?
Yes, there is a long list of papers doing such things with
batman-adv, bmx, olsrd, babel, ...
And the fall-over worked fine in my last tests. There is
always a small time before the disappeared node is detected
by the tq metric but it is nothing breaks normal connections.
Kind regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-22 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-22 14:26 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Recover in case of node fail Carlos Meralto
2015-07-22 15:12 ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
[not found] ` <CALaFpeWSYsMCVFf5mSCnVyOZJRpRzFahSRD5ndVg8rUc9jHpYA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-07-22 18:01 ` Sven Eckelmann
2015-07-23 7:57 ` Sven Eckelmann
2015-07-26 18:27 ` Carlos Meralto
2015-07-26 18:36 ` Sven Eckelmann
2015-07-28 21:26 ` Simon Wunderlich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15974886.03QyElGMEP@bentobox \
--to=sven@narfation.org \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox