public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: introduce "noflood" broadcast flood prevention option
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 05:56:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1906609.VMlLDzDynG@rousseau> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190426171231.18156-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1146 bytes --]

On Saturday, 27 April 2019 01:12:31 HKT Linus Lüssing wrote:
> With DAT DHCP snooping, the gateway feature and multicast optimizations
> in place in some scenarios broadcast flooding might not be strictly
> necessary anymore to be able to establish IPv4/IPv6 communication.
> Therefore this patch adds an option to disable broadcast flooding.
> 
> Larger mesh networks typically filter a variety of multicast packets via
> ebtables/netfilter to clamp on overhead. With this option such firewall
> rules can be relaxed so that such multicast packets are only dropped
> if they cannot be handled by multicast-to-unicast, for instance.

Could you outline the use-case for this specific noflood option in more detail ?
The description above is not entirely clear to me. Especially, the 'might not 
be strictly necessary anymore' to 'firewall rules can be relaxed'. How are 
these things connected ? Is this option implemented only, so that some firewall 
rules don't need to be set anymore ?
What happens if a user enables 'noflood' but does not fall into the 'might not 
be strictly necessary anymore' category ?

Thanks,
Marek

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-26 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-26 17:12 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: introduce "noflood" broadcast flood prevention option Linus Lüssing
2019-04-26 21:56 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2019-04-27  2:38   ` Linus Lüssing
2019-04-27  2:53     ` Linus Lüssing
2019-04-28 17:04 ` Sven Eckelmann
2019-04-28 19:04   ` Martin Weinelt
2019-04-30 16:01     ` Linus Lüssing
2019-04-30 16:07       ` Linus Lüssing
2019-05-02  6:40 ` Sven Eckelmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1906609.VMlLDzDynG@rousseau \
    --to=mareklindner@neomailbox.ch \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox