From: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Add multicast optimization support for bridged setups
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:50:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1982917.uLe1stfMfi@diderot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402531227-15447-1-git-send-email-linus.luessing@web.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4809 bytes --]
On Thursday 12 June 2014 02:00:27 Linus Lüssing wrote:
> @@ -30,17 +53,21 @@
> * Collect multicast addresses of the local multicast listeners
> * on the given soft interface, dev, in the given mcast_list.
> *
> + * If there is a bridge interface on top of dev, collect from that one
> + * instead.
> + *
> * Returns -ENOMEM on memory allocation error or the number of
> * items added to the mcast_list otherwise.
> */
> static int batadv_mcast_mla_softif_get(struct net_device *dev,
> struct hlist_head *mcast_list)
> {
> + struct net_device *bridge = batadv_mcast_get_bridge(dev);
> struct netdev_hw_addr *mc_list_entry;
> struct batadv_hw_addr *new;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - netif_addr_lock_bh(dev);
> + netif_addr_lock_bh(bridge ? bridge : dev);
> netdev_for_each_mc_addr(mc_list_entry, dev) {
> new = kmalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!new) {
Maybe I am missing something but shouldn't we fetch the entries from the
bridge interface instead of dev ?
> /**
> + * batadv_mcast_mla_br_addr_cpy - copy a bridge multicast address
> + * @dst: destination to write to - a multicast MAC address
> + * @src: source to read from - a multicast IP address
> + *
> + * Converts a given multicast IPv4/IPv6 address from a bridge
> + * to its matching multicast MAC address and copies it into the given
> + * destination buffer.
> + *
> + * Caller needs to make sure the destination buffer can hold
> + * at least ETH_ALEN bytes.
> + */
> +static void batadv_mcast_mla_br_addr_cpy(char *dst, const struct br_ip
> *src) +{
> + if (src->proto == htons(ETH_P_IP)) {
> + /* RFC 1112 */
> + memcpy(dst, "\x01\x00\x5e", 3);
> + memcpy(dst + 3, ((char *)&src->u.ip4) + 1, ETH_ALEN - 3);
> + dst[3] &= 0x7F;
> + }
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> + else if (src->proto == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
> + /* RFC 2464 */
> + memcpy(dst, "\x33\x33", 2);
> + memcpy(dst + 2, &src->u.ip6.s6_addr32[3],
> + sizeof(src->u.ip6.s6_addr32[3]));
> + }
> +#endif
> + else
> + memset(dst, 0, ETH_ALEN);
> +}
Is there no cleaner way to do this ? "\x01\x00\x5e" and "\x33\x33" looks
pretty hackish. Are there no defines for mcast prefixes somewhere ?
> +/**
> + * batadv_mcast_mla_bridge_get - get bridged-in multicast listeners
> + * @dev: a bridge slave whose bridge to collect multicast addresses from
> + * @mcast_list: a list to put found addresses into
> + *
> + * Collects multicast addresses of the bridged-in multicast listeners
> + * from the bridge on top of the given soft interface, dev, in the
> + * given mcast_list.
> + *
> + * Returns -ENOMEM on memory allocation error or the number of
> + * items added to the mcast_list otherwise.
> + */
> +static int batadv_mcast_mla_bridge_get(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct hlist_head *mcast_list)
> +{
That is probably where my confusion is coming from. Why do we query the bridge
interface again ?
> @@ -195,19 +306,18 @@ static bool batadv_mcast_mla_tvlv_update(struct
> batadv_priv *bat_priv) mcast_data.flags = BATADV_NO_FLAGS;
> memset(mcast_data.reserved, 0, sizeof(mcast_data.reserved));
>
> - /* Avoid attaching MLAs, if there is a bridge on top of our soft
> - * interface, we don't support that yet (TODO)
> - */
> - if (batadv_mcast_has_bridge(bat_priv)) {
> - if (bat_priv->mcast.enabled) {
> - batadv_tvlv_container_unregister(bat_priv,
> - BATADV_TVLV_MCAST, 1);
> - bat_priv->mcast.enabled = false;
> - }
> + if (!batadv_mcast_has_bridge(bat_priv))
> + goto skip;
>
> - return false;
> - }
> + mcast_data.flags |= BATADV_MCAST_WANT_ALL_UNSNOOPABLES;
> +
> + if (br_multicast_has_querier_adjacent(bat_priv->soft_iface, ETH_P_IP))
> + mcast_data.flags |= BATADV_MCAST_WANT_ALL_IPV4;
>
> + if (br_multicast_has_querier_adjacent(bat_priv->soft_iface, ETH_P_IPV6))
> + mcast_data.flags |= BATADV_MCAST_WANT_ALL_IPV6;
> +
> +skip:
> if (!bat_priv->mcast.enabled ||
> mcast_data.flags != bat_priv->mcast.flags) {
> batadv_tvlv_container_register(bat_priv, BATADV_TVLV_MCAST, 1,
Please find a more intuitive goto label ('skip' is quite generic).
> @@ -233,13 +344,17 @@ void batadv_mcast_mla_update(struct batadv_priv
> *bat_priv) int ret;
>
> if (!batadv_mcast_mla_tvlv_update(bat_priv))
> - goto update;
> + goto skip;
>
> ret = batadv_mcast_mla_softif_get(soft_iface, &mcast_list);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out;
>
> -update:
> + ret = batadv_mcast_mla_bridge_get(soft_iface, &mcast_list);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> +skip:
> batadv_mcast_mla_tt_retract(bat_priv, &mcast_list);
> batadv_mcast_mla_tt_add(bat_priv, &mcast_list);
Again, 'skip' isn't very self-explanatory.
Cheers,
Marek
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-17 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-12 0:00 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Add multicast optimization support for bridged setups Linus Lüssing
2014-06-17 14:50 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2014-06-17 22:24 ` Linus Lüssing
2014-06-18 4:53 ` Marek Lindner
2014-06-20 15:57 ` Linus Lüssing
2014-06-21 6:57 ` Marek Lindner
2014-06-21 12:09 ` Simon Wunderlich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1982917.uLe1stfMfi@diderot \
--to=mareklindner@neomailbox.ch \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox