From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Lindner Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] securing batman gateway Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:08:19 +0200 References: <2bda28cd0706260823h3c1e4d78m27f8eb9809e655cd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2bda28cd0706260823h3c1e4d78m27f8eb9809e655cd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706271208.19749.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi, > Batman has a tunnel with gateway but is it possible to secure it? In first > step only clients with proper credentials can start tunnel and in second > step tunnel is crypted. I agree that this would be a good idea. Using the batman tunnels would be much easier to set up than IPSec as everything is integrated. Besides that a lightweight encryption could be implemented which even runs on weaker machines. That feature is planned and a concept already exists. Nevertheless, the batman developer team has a divided opinion about this idea. Some of us (inlucing me) think that it a good opportunity to help spreading internet gateways throughout a city wide mesh. The others fear that this could be the beginning of the end of free mesh networks if we implement such control mechanisms. What do you think ? Why do you want this feature ? Btw: Does your vis server compile now ? Regards, Marek