From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Axel Neumann Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Multiple connections / prioritiy Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:54:54 +0200 References: <20070723140744.ozvor890jy5cockg@webmail.ddmesh.de> <46A591C0.8090009@poelzi.org> In-Reply-To: <46A591C0.8090009@poelzi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707241254.54152.axel@open-mesh.net> Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi On Tuesday 24 July 2007 07:44, Daniel Poelzleithner wrote: > Freifunk Dresden wrote: > > If I have multiple connections between two nodes, is there a way to > > setup the quality or > > priority of those connection? > > Same goes for Leipzig, we have our vpn[1,2].leipzig.freifunk.net nodes. > I thought about this problem a lot and the simplest solution would be to > simply drop like 9 of 10 batman packets on the outgoing vpn interface. > this is like a olsr multiplicator of 10 with the advantage that it saves > bandwith. on a specific interface a) you man drop received originator messages (OGMs) which does not really reducing the traffic or b) suspend the sending of OGMs However, dropping or suspending should only be applied to OGMs from non-neighboring nodes, otherwise it also affects the bidirectional link check which would result in a confusing side-effect, marking even more packets as invalid. In parallel it might be beneficial to configure different originator intervals for particular interfaces. For example for a vpn connection a very large originator interval (with a small TTL would be sufficient) since its link-quality is not supposed to change anyway (and causing less traffic to the vpn). /axel