From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Lindner Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] dynamic gateway / hna / services Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:56:34 +0200 References: <20070724152109.yhywdc2kj6skcgck@webmail.ddmesh.de> <46A64669.5050604@poelzi.org> In-Reply-To: <46A64669.5050604@poelzi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707251656.34349.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi, > This is a bad idea in my opinion. A routing protocol has one purpose > which is routing, not flooding 99% useless information just because it > COULD. > > i think the right approch for service discovery is using something like > dns for example. dns is very small overheaded, allows great redundancy, > works on demand... > > using TXT and SRV records, a good dns infrastructure and user frontend, > it should be easy to publish services. I totally agree to your point. Just because you can waste bandwidth with OLSR so easily there is no need for us to do the same. Regards, Marek